Received: from p1.selectacast.net (IDENT:root@p1.selectacast.net [206.41.1.251]) by hub.org (8.10.1/8.10.1) with ESMTP id e7PJT8I45684 for ; Fri, 25 Aug 2000 15:29:08 -0400 (EDT) Received: from selectacast.net (IDENT:jks@d1 [209.219.91.66]) by p1.selectacast.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id PAA22062 for ; Fri, 25 Aug 2000 15:29:06 -0400 Message-ID: <39A6C8FD.CE464DFD@selectacast.net> Date: Fri, 25 Aug 2000 15:29:01 -0400 From: Joseph Shraibman Organization: Xtenit X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.75 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.2.15 i686) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: pgsql-interfaces@postgresql.org Subject: Re: JDBC and java.sql.Timestamp References: <39A577C6.52AD43D8@mhsoftware.com> <08dd01c00ec1$d47183e0$0201a8c0@c1075365a> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archive-Number: 200008/159 I'm thinking it would justify a 7.0.3 release of postgres just to keep the traffic about the Timestamp off the mailing list. Bryan Field-Elliot wrote: > > Using the latest stable postgres and JDBC drivers, I am having a problem > which I have seen mentioned here previously; namely, that after inserting a > row with a Timestamp column, and while attempting to retrieve it again (via > JDBC), I get exceptions; I believe this is due to a bug in the format string > in the jdbc client. > > Some have mentioned that a fix is available in CVS, but (believe or not) I > am newbie enough to have not yet used CVS or know how to retrieve patches > via it. > > Is there a released (downloadable, even RPM-downloadable) version of the > JDBC driver with the Timestamp issue fixed? > The official jdbc homepage is http://www.retep.org.uk/postgres/ but it appears to be the 7.0 driver. Peter? > Thanks in advance, > > Bryan