Received: from toptk.com (tp085010.seeder.net [202.43.85.10]) by mail.postgresql.org (8.11.1/8.11.1) with ESMTP id eAH884s29005 for ; Fri, 17 Nov 2000 03:08:05 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from kevin.lo@toptk.com) Received: from toptk.com (tc070195.seeder.net [202.43.70.195] (may be forged)) by toptk.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id QAA14431; Fri, 17 Nov 2000 16:02:09 +0800 Message-ID: <3A14E647.6070901@toptk.com> Date: Fri, 17 Nov 2000 16:03:19 +0800 From: Kevin Lo User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux 2.2.17-4CLE i686; en-US; m18) Gecko/20001107 Netscape6/6.0 X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: The Hermit Hacker CC: Thomas Lockhart , Robert Smith , pgsql-interfaces@postgresql.org Subject: Re: ODBC Maintainer? References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archive-Number: 200011/200 X-Sequence-Number: 236 The Hermit Hacker wrote: > On Fri, 17 Nov 2000, Kevin Lo wrote: > >> Thomas Lockhart wrote: >> >>>> Hey, who is the current active maintainer of the ODBC driver? >>> >>> >>> Unfortunately, there is no "current active maintainer". However, there >>> are several people who have offered to help at a level just under what >>> they felt would be required to be considered the project leader. >>> >>> Volunteers are accepted ;) >> >> I'll be a volunteer to implement odbc driver. Just wondering why don't >> import unixODBC >> code into Postgres src? > > > If I recall correctly, it is under GPL, no? Which conflicts with our BSD > liccense ... of course, I've been known to recall incorrectly at times :) Well, it's under GPL. You recalled incorrectly :-) - Kevin