Received: from mail.postgresql.org (webmail.postgresql.org [216.126.85.28]) by mail.postgresql.org (8.11.1/8.11.1) with SMTP id eANHYsA75720 for ; Thu, 23 Nov 2000 12:34:54 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from pgsql-bugs-owner@postgresql.org) Received: from sensenet.localdomain (c193.150.217.37.cm-upc.chello.se [193.150.217.37]) by mail.postgresql.org (8.11.1/8.11.1) with ESMTP id eAIGmPs43689; Sat, 18 Nov 2000 11:48:29 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from anders@lecando.com) Received: from sensenet.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=lecando.com ident=anders) by sensenet.localdomain with esmtp (Exim 3.16 #1) id 13xB7z-0000Il-00; Sat, 18 Nov 2000 17:46:11 +0100 Message-ID: <3A16B252.86AD5A5D@lecando.com> Date: Sat, 18 Nov 2000 17:46:10 +0100 From: Anders Bengtsson X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.75 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.2.16-22 i586) X-Accept-Language: sv-SE, sv, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Bruce Momjian CC: pgsql-bugs@postgresql.org, PostgreSQL-interfaces Subject: Re: [INTERFACES] Re: no meaningful way to determine fe or beversion? References: <200011171720.MAA25515@candle.pha.pa.us> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archive-Number: 200011/118 X-Sequence-Number: 140 I think Peter Mount looked at it, but there where some big changes to the JDBC driver going on at that time. When I look at the code in CVS now it looks nothing like what it did when I did the patch against it. Anyway, I found my old patch in the archives: http://www.postgresql.org/mhonarc/pgsql-interfaces/2000-09/msg00051.html /Anders Bruce Momjian wrote: > > This concerns me. Did we lose a patch here? Can you send it again? > > > > I posted a patch for the JDBC driver to pgsql-interfaces to do just that > > some time ago. Don't know what happened to it, though .. _____________________________________________________________________ A n d e r s B e n g t s s o n anders@lecando.com Stockholm, Sweden