Received: from newsf2.texas.rr.com (newsf2.texas.rr.com [24.28.95.154])
	by mail.postgresql.org (8.11.1/8.11.1) with ESMTP id eB1HpYF07100
	for <pgsql-general@postgreSQL.org>; Fri, 1 Dec 2000 12:51:34 -0500 (EST)
	(envelope-from eloehr@austin.rr.com)
Received: from austin.rr.com (cs2874-61.austin.rr.com [24.28.74.61])
	by newsf2.texas.rr.com (8.10.1/8.10.1) with ESMTP id eB1HplG20727
	for <pgsql-general@postgreSQL.org>; Fri, 1 Dec 2000 11:51:47 -0600 (CST)
Message-ID: <3A27E743.323691B5@austin.rr.com>
Date: Fri, 01 Dec 2000 12:00:35 -0600
From: Ed Loehr <eloehr@austin.rr.com>
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.75 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.2.12-20smp i686)
X-Accept-Language: en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: pggeneral <pgsql-general@postgreSQL.org>
Subject: RFC:  User reviews of PostgreSQL RI functionality
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Archive-Number: 200012/27
X-Sequence-Number: 1207

How well is the recently-added PostgreSQL functionality supporting
referential integrity (RI) working.  Any serious bugs?  Any major
hinderances?  Other impressions?

I'd be particularly interested in hearing from people who've implemented
larger schemas using RI (say, more than 30 tables and 50 foreign keys).

Regards,
Ed Loehr