Received: from p1.selectacast.net (p1.selectacast.net [206.41.1.251]) by mail.postgresql.org (8.11.1/8.11.1) with ESMTP id f0OMPoq80500 for ; Wed, 24 Jan 2001 17:25:50 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from jks@selectacast.net) Received: from selectacast.net (IDENT:jks@d1 [209.219.91.66]) by p1.selectacast.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id RAA22392; Wed, 24 Jan 2001 17:25:45 -0500 Message-ID: <3A6F5668.3C7443F7@selectacast.net> Date: Wed, 24 Jan 2001 17:25:44 -0500 From: Joseph Shraibman Organization: Xtenit, Inc. http://www.xtenit.com X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.76 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.4.0 i686) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Bruce Momjian , PostgreSQL jdbc list Subject: Re: [PATCHES] Re: [INTERFACES] Patch for JDBC timestamp problems References: <200101241418.JAA14935@candle.pha.pa.us> <3A6F4FA6.38864C90@selectacast.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archive-Number: 200101/40 X-Sequence-Number: 45 Joseph Shraibman wrote: > > No, it cannot be static. > Well actually there could be static variables, but they could not be used directly. It might pay just to keep them around to clone() so we don't have to reconstruct them for every method that uses them. But the performance gain would be minimal and would add a bit of confusion to the code, so I don't suggest it. -- Joseph Shraibman jks@selectacast.net Increase signal to noise ratio. http://www.targabot.com