Message-ID: <3A773ED6.8B66A48B@selectacast.net>
Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2001 17:23:18 -0500
From: Joseph Shraibman <jks@selectacast.net>
Organization: Xtenit, Inc. http://www.xtenit.com
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Peter T Mount <peter@retep.org.uk>
CC: Michael Stephenson <mstephenson@tirin.openworld.co.uk>,
	PostgreSQL jdbc list <pgsql-jdbc@postgresql.org>
Subject: Re: Re: [PATCHES] Re: [INTERFACES] Patch for JDBC timestamp problems
References: <Pine.LNX.4.30.0101250949190.20707-100000@tirin.openworld.co.uk>
	<3A760360.DA37F1C@selectacast.net>
	<980862184.3a76c4e8bf0e6@webmail.retep.org.uk>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Peter T Mount wrote:
> 
> Quoting Joseph Shraibman <jks@selectacast.net>:
> 
> > Michael Stephenson wrote:
> > >
> > > On Wed, 24 Jan 2001, Joseph Shraibman wrote:
> > >
> > > > > What was the conclusion of this discussion?  Do we leave it
> > static?
> > > >
> > > > No, it cannot be static.
> > >
> > > As I see it we have three possible solutions to this problems.
> > >
> > > a) Just stop it being static, each PreparedStatement gets a new
> > >    instantiation (I think this is what we've done for now).
> > > b) static ThreadLocal, each Thread gets one instantiation.
> >
> > But I think some people are still using java 1.1.x and they don't have
> > ThreadLocal.
> 
> True, except the 1.1 & 1.2 implementations are different packages, so you
> simply don't do ThreadLocal in 1.1.x
> 

Umm, not exactly.  You can use jdbc 2 with java 1.1.x by downloading a
seperate package.  I'm not sure how many people do this, but I imagine
there are a few.


-- 
Joseph Shraibman
jks@selectacast.net
Increase signal to noise ratio.  http://www.targabot.com