Received: from mail.zhengmai.net.cn ([202.99.6.1])
	by mail.postgresql.org (8.11.1/8.11.1) with ESMTP id f1N3Bmx56420;
	Thu, 22 Feb 2001 22:11:56 -0500 (EST)
	(envelope-from laser@zhengmai.com.cn)
Received: from zhengmai.com.cn (laser@[211.99.254.100])
	by mail.zhengmai.net.cn (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id LAA07753;
	Fri, 23 Feb 2001 11:10:48 +0800 (BST)
Message-ID: <3A95D584.F12A42F0@zhengmai.com.cn>
Date: Fri, 23 Feb 2001 11:14:12 +0800
From: "He Weiping(Laser Henry)" <laser@zhengmai.com.cn>
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.76 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.2.18 i686)
X-Accept-Language: en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>
CC: Tatsuo Ishii <t-ishii@sra.co.jp>, pgsql-general@postgresql.org,
	pgsql-interfaces@postgresql.org, pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Re: [INTERFACES] Re: Chinese patch for Pgaccess
References: <200102230121.UAA01625@candle.pha.pa.us>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=gb2312
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Archive-Number: 200102/1173
X-Sequence-Number: 5098

>
> > appropriate. There are several encodings for Chinese including
> > GB(EUC-CN), Big5, EUC-TW. At least we should be able to distinguish
> > them. What about "chinese(GB)" or whatever?
>
> Renamed to chinese-gb.
>

I think chinese-gb is ok, thanks!

Regards

Laser