Received: from sd.tpf.co.jp (sd.tpf.co.jp [210.161.239.34])
	by postgresql.org (8.11.3/8.11.1) with SMTP id f493K2A65947
	for <pgsql-odbc@postgresql.org>; Tue, 8 May 2001 23:20:02 -0400 (EDT)
	(envelope-from Inoue@tpf.co.jp)
Received: (qmail 6442 invoked from network); 9 May 2001 03:19:57 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO viscomail.tpf.co.jp) (100.0.0.108)
	by sd2.10.0.100.in-addr.arpa with SMTP; 9 May 2001 03:19:57 -0000
Received: from tpf.co.jp (3d_note1 [126.0.1.61])
	by viscomail.tpf.co.jp (8.8.8+Sun/8.8.8) with ESMTP id MAA02323;
	Wed, 9 May 2001 12:19:56 +0900 (JST)
Message-ID: <3AF8B775.C63AE519@tpf.co.jp>
Date: Wed, 09 May 2001 12:20:21 +0900
From: Hiroshi Inoue <Inoue@tpf.co.jp>
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.73 [ja] (Windows NT 5.0; U)
X-Accept-Language: ja
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>
CC: Keith Millard <Kmillard@pumatech.com>,
	PostgreSQL odbc list <pgsql-odbc@postgresql.org>
Subject: Re: Re: [INTERFACES] Postgres odbc driver bug
References: <200105090258.f492w8u21241@candle.pha.pa.us>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-2022-jp
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Archive-Number: 200105/53
X-Sequence-Number: 442

Bruce Momjian wrote:
> 
> > > And you are saying that this patch fixes a different problem.  The user
> > > reported his problems were fixed by that patch, so I am inclined to
> > > apply it.
> > >
> >
> > I don't agree to apply the patch because the patch makes
> > the current code hardly understandable.
> 
> Agreed.  I mentioned to Keith I was going to clean it up before
> application.  Here is the cleaned up patch.
> 
> Hiroshi, what do you think?
> 

Hmm that's not what I mean. The patch essentially means
that the STMT_PREMATURE state is unnecessary. Well why is
the concept *PREMATURE* introduced ? What meaning does the
stuff related to the concept *PREMATURE* have ? IMHO we
have to reconsider from the first.

regards,
Hiroshi Inoue