Received: from postgresql.org.org (webmail.postgresql.org [216.126.85.28]) by postgresql.org (8.11.3/8.11.1) with SMTP id f5BCh6E54376 for ; Mon, 11 Jun 2001 08:43:06 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from pgsql-docs-owner@postgresql.org) Received: from flex.flex.ro (ns.flex.ro [193.230.255.2]) by postgresql.org (8.11.3/8.11.1) with ESMTP id f54CdpE99997; Mon, 4 Jun 2001 08:39:55 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from teo@flex.ro) Received: from flex.ro (teo.flex.ro [193.230.255.3]) by flex.flex.ro (8.11.0/8.11.0) with ESMTP id f54CdlH17181; Mon, 4 Jun 2001 15:39:57 +0300 Message-ID: <3B1B8169.3A59F5D1@flex.ro> Date: Mon, 04 Jun 2001 15:39:05 +0300 From: Constantin Teodorescu Organization: PCNet Braila X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.77 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.4.2-2 i686) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Tom Lane CC: pgsql-interfaces@postgresql.org, pgsql-docs@postgresql.org Subject: Re: [INTERFACES] Lots of obsolete docs in pgaccess/lib/help References: <20892.991198271@sss.pgh.pa.us> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archive-Number: 200106/18 X-Sequence-Number: 813 Tom Lane wrote: > > I notice that pgaccess' help files contain a lot of out-of-date quotes > from the primary documentation files. This is not good. > > It looks like these files were once quasi-automatically generated from > the main files. Any chance of getting that process put into place > fully automatically? If not, frankly I'd vote for ripping the pgaccess > help facility out altogether: better people should have to go look at > the real docs than that they should have convenient instant access to > misinformation. No. For the moment, the Help files were written manually so I think that they should be updated the same way. It would be better to me that I'll know what topics are changed so I can prepare them for the next release. Constantin Teodorescu