Received: from localhost (postgresql.org [64.49.215.8]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8C919475B8E for ; Wed, 20 Nov 2002 01:12:40 -0500 (EST) Received: from localhost.localdomain (m019-145.nv.iinet.net.au [203.217.19.145]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E1E1A475A71 for ; Wed, 20 Nov 2002 01:12:38 -0500 (EST) Received: from BadgerSE.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by localhost.localdomain (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id gAK6CX102489 for ; Wed, 20 Nov 2002 17:12:33 +1100 Message-ID: <3DDB27D0.8060501@BadgerSE.com> Date: Wed, 20 Nov 2002 17:12:32 +1100 From: Bruce Badger User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.0.1) Gecko/20021003 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: pgsql-interfaces@postgresql.org Subject: Re: Question about the postgresql protocol References: <20021119044241.272FF475C45@postgresql.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: by AMaViS new-20020517 X-Archive-Number: 200211/125 X-Sequence-Number: 3373 Have there been any changes at all in the Frontend/Backend protocol between 7.2 and 7.3? I ask, of course, because there were some unannounced changed to the protocol between 7.1 and 7.2, and I'd rather not get bitten again ;-) BTW, I maintain the open source PostgreSQL drivers used with a number of (commercial and open source) Smalltalk implementations. Thanks, Bruce Badger ljb wrote: >zhouhanok@vip.sina.com wrote: > > >>Hi, >> >> Could you tell me what's the latest postgresql protocol version? 2.3 or 2.= >>4 or ...? >> >> > >2.0 > > > >> And where can I find the latest specification(details) about the protocol?= >> Is http://www.postgresql.org/idocs/index.php?protocol.html the latest one? >> >> > >Yes that's the one. >It's also in the source distribution, installed in .../doc/html/ > >---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- >TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster > >