X-Original-To: pgsql-interfaces-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org Received: from localhost (neptune.hub.org [200.46.204.2]) by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A36D4D1B560 for ; Sun, 7 Dec 2003 22:20:54 +0000 (GMT) Received: from svr1.postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (neptune.hub.org [200.46.204.2]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 04987-01 for ; Sun, 7 Dec 2003 18:20:28 -0400 (AST) Received: from hosting.commandprompt.com (224.commandprompt.com [207.173.200.224]) by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 38731D1B4DF for ; Sun, 7 Dec 2003 18:20:25 -0400 (AST) Received: from commandprompt.com (clbb-109.saw.net [64.146.135.109]) (authenticated) by hosting.commandprompt.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id hB7MKNu22313; Sun, 7 Dec 2003 14:20:24 -0800 Message-ID: <3FD3A7AF.1060700@commandprompt.com> Date: Sun, 07 Dec 2003 14:20:31 -0800 From: "Joshua D. Drake" Organization: Command Prompt, Inc. User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.4) Gecko/20030917 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Gerhard_H=E4ring?= Cc: pgsql-interfaces@postgresql.org, darcy@PyGreSQL.org Subject: Re: 7.4 and Pygresql References: <32489.68.62.129.152.1070507821.squirrel@award.gotdns.org> <3FCEEC80.7000509@ghaering.de> <200312040641.03515.darcy@PyGreSQL.org> <3FCF3ACC.4060609@ghaering.de> In-Reply-To: <3FCF3ACC.4060609@ghaering.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at postgresql.org X-Archive-Number: 200312/19 X-Sequence-Number: 4628 >> >> You know, I expect that sort of FUD from commercial enterprises that >> have something to gain by switching people to their product. > > > I've recommended pyPgSQL *or* psycopg, because I honestly believe that > they're better options for developers (a lot more complete, and > actively developed, and bug reports/patches don't get lost). So it's > not true that I only tried to promote the project I'm involved in. It is our experience that pyPgSQL and psycopg are much better supported than the PyGreSQL. We have tried PyGreSQL in the past and found it to be lacking. I seriously doubt, regardless of D'Arcy's biased that he was presenting a case based on just involvement of himself in a project. Specifically we have developed over 100,000 dollars worth of code in psycopg without issue. Sincerley, Joshua D. Drake -- Command Prompt, Inc., home of Mammoth PostgreSQL - S/ODBC - S/JDBC Postgresql support, programming, shared hosting and dedicated hosting. +1-503-222-2783 - jd@commandprompt.com - http://www.commandprompt.com