X-Original-To: pgsql-hackers-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.204.2]) by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F0E65D1DB23 for ; Fri, 30 Apr 2004 20:02:55 -0300 (ADT) Received: from svr1.postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (neptune.hub.org [200.46.204.2]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 81219-10 for ; Fri, 30 Apr 2004 20:02:36 -0300 (ADT) Received: from trolak.mydnsbox2.com (ns1.mydnsbox2.com [207.44.142.118]) by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1A10CD1E807 for ; Fri, 30 Apr 2004 20:02:33 -0300 (ADT) Received: from dunslane.net (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) (authenticated (0 bits)) by trolak.mydnsbox2.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id i3UN5ZL27515 for ; Fri, 30 Apr 2004 18:05:35 -0500 Received: from 24.211.141.25 (SquirrelMail authenticated user andrew@dunslane.net) by www.dunslane.net with HTTP; Fri, 30 Apr 2004 19:05:35 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <4068.24.211.141.25.1083366335.squirrel@www.dunslane.net> Date: Fri, 30 Apr 2004 19:05:35 -0400 (EDT) Subject: Re: ecpg and the timezone database From: "Andrew Dunstan" To: In-Reply-To: <200404302048.i3UKmXr09147@candle.pha.pa.us> References: <200404302048.i3UKmXr09147@candle.pha.pa.us> X-Priority: 3 Importance: Normal X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: SquirrelMail (version 1.2.5) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at postgresql.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.1 tagged_above=0.0 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_SORBS X-Spam-Level: X-Archive-Number: 200404/1143 X-Sequence-Number: 53065 Bruce Momjian said: > Does ecpg need to use the same timezone database as the backend? > > I just committed code so it will not, but I am not sure. > surely all clients should be utterly ignorant of what the backend uses? cheers andrew