X-Original-To: pgsql-interfaces-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.204.144]) by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 201DBD1B2E0 for ; Tue, 29 Jun 2004 12:30:33 -0300 (ADT) Received: from svr1.postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (av.hub.org [200.46.204.144]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 34824-09 for ; Tue, 29 Jun 2004 15:30:32 +0000 (GMT) Received: from ns2.leveltelecom.net (unknown [213.60.244.12]) by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B19AAD1B2BD for ; Tue, 29 Jun 2004 12:30:29 -0300 (ADT) Received: from leveltelecom.es ([62.87.72.2]) (authenticated bits=0) by ns2.leveltelecom.net (8.12.3/8.12.3/SuSE Linux 0.6) with ESMTP id i5TEw2Qx016811 for ; Tue, 29 Jun 2004 16:58:06 +0200 Message-ID: <40E18B1E.7010500@leveltelecom.es> Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2004 17:30:38 +0200 From: Carlos Ojea Castro User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.0.0) Gecko/20020623 Debian/1.0.0-0.woody.1 X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 Cc: pgsql-interfaces@postgresql.org Subject: Re: : query using kylix (delphi) References: <40D84E00.2050602@leveltelecom.es> <40E14C80.4040209@leveltelecom.es> <200406291509.48031.darko.prenosil@finteh.hr> <20040629142641.GN56428@xs4all.nl> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at hub.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 tagged_above=0.0 required=5.0 tests= X-Spam-Level: X-Archive-Number: 200406/65 X-Sequence-Number: 4993 Jeroen T. Vermeulen wrote: >On Tue, Jun 29, 2004 at 03:09:47PM +0200, Darko Prenosil wrote: > > >>On Tuesday 29 June 2004 13:03, Carlos Ojea Castro wrote: >> >> > > > >>>I am trying to access a postgresql database using kylix (delhi). >>>I made a SQLConnection object and I got it active. >>>Then I made a SQLQuery object, but when I try to make it active, i get a >>>'access violation' message. >>> >>> > > > >> This is not right list to ask questions about Kylix, however >>you probably have no access permissions to get the data (SELECT permission on >>targer table). >> >> > >This may be a stupid question, but better safe than sorry: is the >message really a database-level access violation? Or is it an access >violation in the sense of the process touching an invalid address? It's >called a Segmentation Fault in the Unix world [Unix is not a trademark of >The SCO Group Inc. etc. etc. etc.] but IIRC Windows likes to call it an >Access Violation. > I am not sure. Where could I take a look at postgresql server log? Thanks, Carlos