X-Original-To: pgsql-interfaces-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org
Received: from localhost (av.hub.org [200.46.204.144])
	by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B98479DC99D
	for <pgsql-interfaces-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org>;
	Wed, 15 Feb 2006 06:41:46 -0400 (AST)
Received: from postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71])
	by localhost (av.hub.org [200.46.204.144]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
	with ESMTP id 87006-10
	for <pgsql-interfaces-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org>;
	Wed, 15 Feb 2006 06:41:48 -0400 (AST)
X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-
Received: from moutng.kundenserver.de (moutng.kundenserver.de
	[212.227.126.187])
	by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5E1B99DC9C4
	for <pgsql-interfaces@postgresql.org>;
	Wed, 15 Feb 2006 06:41:44 -0400 (AST)
Received: from [84.173.12.112] (helo=[192.168.1.10])
	by mrelayeu.kundenserver.de (node=mrelayeu5) with ESMTP (Nemesis),
	id 0ML25U-1F9K6U2YAa-0001Q2; Wed, 15 Feb 2006 11:41:46 +0100
Message-ID: <43F30569.9010705@online.de>
Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2006 11:41:45 +0100
From: Christoph Zwerschke <cito@online.de>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US;
	rv:1.7.5) Gecko/20041206 Thunderbird/1.0 Mnenhy/0.6.0.104
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: pgsql-interfaces@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: Finding the pqlib version
References: <43EDC399.6060203@online.de> <200602142331.18865.peter_e@gmx.net>
	<43F26194.1010202@online.de> <200602151125.04309.peter_e@gmx.net>
In-Reply-To: <200602151125.04309.peter_e@gmx.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Provags-ID: kundenserver.de abuse@kundenserver.de
	login:d4c19f41f9a9703255691874c1441822
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at hub.org
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.08 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.080]
X-Spam-Score: 0.08
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Archive-Number: 200602/59
X-Sequence-Number: 6023

Peter Eisentraut wrote:
 > Christoph Zwerschke wrote:
 >> Which do you think would be the right package/feature category for
 >> pg_config for Linux/Windows? devel and Development->Tools/utilities?
 >
 > I'm not sure what these categories are supposed to mean but they don't
 > sound wrong.  To gauge the correct placement I would say that whenever
 > you install libpq-fe.h you should get pg_config in the same
 > package/module/installation.

The problem is that the Windows installer has the "Development" feature 
subdivided into "Include files", "Library files", "PGXS files" and 
"Tools and utilities". Installing pg_config along with the include files 
would be confusing in this case.

By the way, putting the "Library files" under "Development" seems a bit 
unlucky, too. It should be on the top level instead. Where should such a 
suggestion be sent to? pgsql-patches?

-- Christoph