Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.204.182]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 807E92E2DC1 for ; Fri, 16 Nov 2007 05:17:04 -0400 (AST) Received: from postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.204.182]) (amavisd-maia, port 10024) with ESMTP id 27092-02 for ; Fri, 16 Nov 2007 05:16:56 -0400 (AST) Received: from developer.pgadmin.org (developer.pgadmin.org [63.246.23.140]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4BD1F2E2D6B for ; Fri, 16 Nov 2007 05:16:59 -0400 (AST) Received: from [172.16.0.68] ([89.240.194.76]) (authenticated bits=0) by developer.pgadmin.org (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id lAG9Gphh012881 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Fri, 16 Nov 2007 09:16:52 GMT Message-ID: <473D6006.7080504@postgresql.org> Date: Fri, 16 Nov 2007 09:16:54 +0000 From: Dave Page User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.9 (Windows/20071031) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Marc G. Fournier" CC: "Joshua D. Drake" , Magnus Hagander , pgsql-www@postgresql.org Subject: Re: change to interfaces.html References: <20071115105151.79ff8061@scratch> <473C9D0A.1090409@hagander.net> <20071115112738.60c3a837@scratch> <9B276A8E7D64C7A3E5CFD1ED@ganymede.hub.org> <473D5A2A.9070904@postgresql.org> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1 X-Archive-Number: 200711/273 X-Sequence-Number: 13051 Marc G. Fournier wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > > > - --On Friday, November 16, 2007 08:51:54 +0000 Dave Page > wrote: > >> Marc G. Fournier wrote: >>>> Sure :) I was just trying to be alphabetical which is why i put ODBCng >>>> first (versus pgODBC). >>> That makes sense .. some sort of logical order would make it easier to find >>> things ... >> Except it then looks like we prefer the Command Prompt code over the >> community code. > > No, then it looks like its in alphabetical order ... *now* it looks like we > prefer one over the other, since there is no order to it ... We do - we prefer the community code over the one produced and maintained by a single company, and released under a licence that is potentially very restrictive (depending on the interpretation which has yet to be tested in court afaik). /D