Message-ID: <473DC935.7030204@commandprompt.com>
Date: Fri, 16 Nov 2007 08:45:41 -0800
From: "Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com>
Organization: Command Prompt, Inc.
User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.13 (Windows/20070809)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Andrew Sullivan <ajs@crankycanuck.ca>
CC: pgsql-www@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: change to interfaces.html
References: <20071115105151.79ff8061@scratch> <473C9D0A.1090409@hagander.net>
	<20071115112738.60c3a837@scratch>
	<9B276A8E7D64C7A3E5CFD1ED@ganymede.hub.org>
	<473D5A2A.9070904@postgresql.org>
	<C198CEF1186974C7C668719D@ganymede.hub.org>
	<473D6006.7080504@postgresql.org>
	<473DB9E9.3000006@commandprompt.com>
	<473DBE05.2030609@postgresql.org>
	<20071116163542.GL24718@crankycanuck.ca>
In-Reply-To: <20071116163542.GL24718@crankycanuck.ca>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Andrew Sullivan wrote:
> I'd prefer we not get into a flamewar over this, all, but I'm a little
> concerned about this:
> 
> On Fri, Nov 16, 2007 at 03:57:57PM +0000, Dave Page wrote:
>> - The general Open Source community's annoyance at MySQL GPL'ing their 
>> drivers precisely because they want people to pay for the non-GPL licence.
> 
> I think the complaint there is the dual licence stuff, and not the GPL as
> such (at least, I'd hope so, since otherwise there'd be a similar objection
> to the linux kernel licence, and there doesn't seem to be).  I don't see on
> the ODBCng pages any suggestion of a second licence.  Is there?

No.

Joshua D. Drake

> 
> A
>