Received: from sss.sss.pgh.pa.us (sss.pgh.pa.us [209.114.166.2]) by hub.org (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id NAA65679 for ; Sat, 4 Dec 1999 13:06:27 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us) Received: from sss.sss.pgh.pa.us (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sss.sss.pgh.pa.us (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id NAA04855; Sat, 4 Dec 1999 13:05:19 -0500 (EST) To: Vince Gonzalez cc: pgsql-interfaces@postgreSQL.org Subject: Re: [INTERFACES] duplicate messages In-reply-to: Your message of Sat, 4 Dec 1999 10:49:15 -0500 <19991204104915.A7354@moe.nycrc.net> Date: Sat, 04 Dec 1999 13:05:18 -0500 Message-ID: <4853.944330718@sss.pgh.pa.us> From: Tom Lane Vince Gonzalez writes: > It seems someone is resending messages to the list. Is anyone else > seeing this? I have an extra Delivered-To: line in my headers on the > second message: > Delivered-To: co_force-comodo-stuart@comodo.net > What's going on? Yeah, some broken mailer was regurgitating messages back to the pgsql-interfaces list :-(. This happens fairly often, because there are so many incompetently-written Internet-to-something-else mail gateways out there; too many of them bounce failed mailing-list messages back to the original author (bad) or the list submission address (worse), rather than to the list errors address like they're supposed to. I believe Marc removed the offending address from the list yesterday. But since there seemed to be a day or so's delay in the message loop, we might have to put up with another batch before the queue empties at comodo.net. Have patience... regards, tom lane