Received: from sss.pgh.pa.us ([192.204.191.242])
	by postgresql.org (8.11.3/8.11.4) with ESMTP id f93HjCn61165
	for <pgsql-interfaces@postgresql.org>;
	Wed, 3 Oct 2001 13:45:12 -0400 (EDT)
	(envelope-from tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us)
Received: from sss2.sss.pgh.pa.us (tgl@localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by sss.pgh.pa.us (8.11.4/8.11.4) with ESMTP id f93HfYI06312;
	Wed, 3 Oct 2001 13:41:35 -0400 (EDT)
To: "Darko Prenosil" <Darko.Prenosil@finteh.hr>
cc: "Bruce Momjian" <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>,
	"pgsql interfaces" <pgsql-interfaces@postgresql.org>
Subject: Re: 
In-reply-to: <007e01c14c2e$d1e69240$ef00000a@darko> 
References: <007e01c14c2e$d1e69240$ef00000a@darko>
Comments: In-reply-to "Darko Prenosil" <Darko.Prenosil@finteh.hr>
	message dated "Wed, 03 Oct 2001 19:13:07 +0200"
Date: Wed, 03 Oct 2001 13:41:34 -0400
Message-ID: <6309.1002130894@sss.pgh.pa.us>
From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
X-Archive-Number: 200110/9
X-Sequence-Number: 1977

"Darko Prenosil" <Darko.Prenosil@finteh.hr> writes:
> We wanted to use non-blocking PQSendQuery to send a large query which =
> consists of many SELECTs. Our pglib interface sent just first 8192 bytes =
> and returned EOF. Whole query was more than 64k.

I've said since day one that libpq's non-blocking mode is fundamentally
broken --- see http://fts.postgresql.org/db/mw/msg.html?mid=35774 and
rest of that thread.  Tempt me not too far, or I'll rip it all out
until someone reimplements it in a non-broken fashion ...

			regards, tom lane