X-Original-To: pgsql-interfaces@postgresql.org Received: from spampd.localdomain (postgresql.org [64.49.215.8]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 59E42476262 for ; Wed, 9 Apr 2003 11:06:29 -0400 (EDT) Received: from sss.pgh.pa.us (unknown [192.204.191.242]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 998CB476227 for ; Wed, 9 Apr 2003 11:06:28 -0400 (EDT) Received: from sss2.sss.pgh.pa.us (tgl@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sss.pgh.pa.us (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id h39F6X2L006986; Wed, 9 Apr 2003 11:06:33 -0400 (EDT) To: Andreas Pflug Cc: pgsql-interfaces@postgresql.org Subject: Re: column type/typmod for domains in backend protocol In-reply-to: <3E940BDA.5040609@web.de> References: <3E7B3BA7.20709@web.de> <13532.1048264312@sss.pgh.pa.us> <3E940BDA.5040609@web.de> Comments: In-reply-to Andreas Pflug message dated "Wed, 09 Apr 2003 14:02:34 +0200" Date: Wed, 09 Apr 2003 11:06:33 -0400 Message-ID: <6985.1049900793@sss.pgh.pa.us> From: Tom Lane X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-32.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION,IN_REP_TO,QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT, REFERENCES,REPLY_WITH_QUOTES autolearn=ham version=2.50 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.50 (1.173-2003-02-20-exp) X-Archive-Number: 200304/49 X-Sequence-Number: 3988 Andreas Pflug writes: >>> Actually, best thing for this problems would be if the backend would >>> deliver the base type oid, not the user type oid. > is there any more conversation or decision about this I missed? I > couldn't find a thread about this topic in pgsql-hackers. AFAIR no one else has troubled to take a stand on the issue. I'll follow your lead unless someone complains. regards, tom lane