Received: from localhost (postgresql.org [64.49.215.8])
	by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 25E4C475CBC
	for <pgsql-interfaces@postgresql.org>;
	Thu, 19 Dec 2002 18:14:26 -0500 (EST)
Received: from sss.pgh.pa.us (unknown [192.204.191.242])
	by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7118F475C60
	for <pgsql-interfaces@postgresql.org>;
	Thu, 19 Dec 2002 18:14:25 -0500 (EST)
Received: from sss2.sss.pgh.pa.us (tgl@localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by sss.pgh.pa.us (8.12.6/8.12.6) with ESMTP id gBJNEPpd007456;
	Thu, 19 Dec 2002 18:14:25 -0500 (EST)
To: Laurette Cisneros <laurette@nextbus.com>
Cc: pgsql-interfaces@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: Pg (Perl for Postgresql) 
In-reply-to: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0212191458030.16486-100000@visor.corp.nextbus.com>
References: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0212191458030.16486-100000@visor.corp.nextbus.com>
Comments: In-reply-to Laurette Cisneros <laurette@nextbus.com>
	message dated "Thu, 19 Dec 2002 15:01:36 -0800"
Date: Thu, 19 Dec 2002 18:14:25 -0500
Message-ID: <7455.1040339665@sss.pgh.pa.us>
From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
X-Virus-Scanned: by AMaViS new-20020517
X-Archive-Number: 200212/61
X-Sequence-Number: 3474

Laurette Cisneros <laurette@nextbus.com> writes:
> Is there a newer version of Pg that should be used that can read both 7.2
> and 7.3 databases?

I suspect this failure has nothing to do with Pg itself.  I suggest
printing out the query error message, rather than guessing about the
problem ...

			regards, tom lane