Received: from mail-relay.eunet.no (mail-relay.eunet.no [193.71.71.242]) by hub.org (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id EAA43728 for ; Thu, 24 Jun 1999 04:08:08 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from tih@Norway.EU.net) Received: from athene.i.eunet.no (IDENT:root@athene.i.eunet.no [193.71.2.52]) by mail-relay.eunet.no (8.9.3/8.9.3/GN) with ESMTP id KAA66711; Thu, 24 Jun 1999 10:08:05 +0200 (CEST) Received: (from tih@localhost) by athene.i.eunet.no (8.8.8/8.8.8) id KAA07869; Thu, 24 Jun 1999 10:08:03 +0200 (CEST) To: Maarten Boekhold Cc: Steven Bradley , pgsql-interfaces@postgreSQL.org Subject: Re: [INTERFACES] Performance References: <3.0.5.32.19990623150509.0092e990@poptop.llnl.gov> <86g13i86cz.fsf@athene.i.eunet.no> <3771E013.E64518BA@tibco.com> From: Tom Ivar Helbekkmo Date: 24 Jun 1999 10:08:03 +0200 In-Reply-To: Maarten Boekhold's message of "Thu, 24 Jun 1999 09:36:51 +0200" Message-ID: <86d7ym81i4.fsf@athene.i.eunet.no> Lines: 11 X-Mailer: Gnus v5.6.44/Emacs 19.34 Maarten Boekhold writes: > This makes a difference, since a lot of processing is done on commit > time. The second variant might thus be misleading. Yup, but I did include the time to commit in the measurement. In fact, I used the time(1) command to time the whole run of the client program. -tih -- Popularity is the hallmark of mediocrity. --Niles Crane, "Frasier"