Received: from hesiod.nhh.no (root@hesiod.nhh.no [158.37.96.15]) by hub.org (8.8.8/8.7.5) with ESMTP id PAA21201 for ; Fri, 17 Apr 1998 15:26:38 -0400 (EDT) Received: from athene.nhh.no (root@athene.nhh.no [158.37.96.16]) by hesiod.nhh.no (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id VAA06063; Fri, 17 Apr 1998 21:26:19 +0200 (CEST) Received: from Hamartun.Priv.NO (Uhamartu@localhost) by athene.nhh.no (8.8.5/8.8.5) with UUCP id VAA28266; Fri, 17 Apr 1998 21:21:38 +0200 (CEST) Received: (from tih@localhost) by barsoom.Hamartun.Priv.NO (8.8.8/8.8.8) id UAA06426; Fri, 17 Apr 1998 20:38:04 +0200 (CEST) To: Stephen Davies Cc: Byron Nikolaidis , pgsql-interfaces@postgreSQL.org Subject: Re: [INTERFACES] Re: ODBC driver References: <199804162349.JAA20804@mustang.sdc.com.au> From: Tom Ivar Helbekkmo Date: 17 Apr 1998 20:38:02 +0200 In-Reply-To: Stephen Davies's message of "Fri, 17 Apr 1998 09:19:00 +0930" Message-ID: <86yax4cn05.fsf@barsoom.Hamartun.Priv.NO> Lines: 14 X-Mailer: Gnus v5.6.4/Emacs 19.34 Stephen Davies writes: > I do not know what the internal representation is but they are > displayed by psql as either dd-mm-yyyy or mm-dd-yyyy depending on > whether the server has -o -e or not. As in most parts of the world, > Australia uses dd-mm-yyyy as a standard. Well, no. I have no idea which is more common of the two you mention, but the majority of the people of this world actually use the ISO 8601 standard representation: yyyy-mm-dd. -tih -- Popularity is the hallmark of mediocrity. --Niles Crane, "Frasier"