Received: from ns.gcom.ru (Garant-Siberia-PostOffice.gcom.ru [194.84.180.33])
	by hub.org (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id CAA00723
	for <pgsql-interfaces@postgreSQL.org>;
	Wed, 13 Jan 1999 02:48:09 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from avd@avd.gcom.ru)
Received: (from uucp@localhost) by ns.gcom.ru (8.6.10/8.6.10) id NAA27846;
	Wed, 13 Jan 1999 13:46:53 +0600
Received: from avd.gcom.ru(194.84.180.53)
	via SMTP by Garant-Siberia-PostOffice.gcom.ru, id smtpd027844;
	Wed Jan 13 13:46:51 1999
Received: (from avd@localhost) by avd.gcom.ru (8.8.8/8.8.8) id OAA03144;
	Wed, 13 Jan 1999 14:01:33 +0600 (NS) (envelope-from avd)
To: Sergio <ser@perio.unlp.edu.ar>
Cc: lockhart@alumni.caltech.edu, pgsql-interfaces@postgreSQL.org
Subject: Re: [INTERFACES] yet another postgresql interface
References: <SAK.1.1.1999.cjpjcgod@speedy.perio.unlp.edu.ar>
From: Aleksey Demakov <avd@gcom.ru>
Date: 13 Jan 1999 14:01:32 +0600
In-Reply-To: Sergio's message of Fri, 1 Jan 1999 02:29:44 -0300
Message-ID: <87r9szob37.fsf@avd.gcom.ru>
Lines: 16
X-Mailer: Gnus v5.5/Emacs 20.2

Sergio <ser@perio.unlp.edu.ar> writes:

> >I dubbed it pguile. 
> 
> what about libpqguile ?, 
> so we have libpq, libpq++, libpqguile, libpq*
> 
> IMO pguile is too generic.

Hmm... Probably, you are right. The name pguile is bad.
I'll change it to guile-pgsql. Most guile extensions are
called this way (guile-gtk, guile-tcltk, guile-hobbit).

-- 
Aleksey Demakov
avd@gcom.ru