X-Original-To: pgsql-interfaces-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org Received: from localhost (av.hub.org [200.46.204.144]) by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3984FDB991 for ; Thu, 17 Nov 2005 17:39:27 -0400 (AST) Received: from svr1.postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (av.hub.org [200.46.204.144]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 52651-02-2 for ; Thu, 17 Nov 2005 21:39:28 +0000 (GMT) X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey- Received: from sss.pgh.pa.us (sss.pgh.pa.us [66.207.139.130]) by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 554F0DB9BF for ; Thu, 17 Nov 2005 17:39:22 -0400 (AST) Received: from sss2.sss.pgh.pa.us (tgl@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sss.pgh.pa.us (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id jAHLdOCM008817; Thu, 17 Nov 2005 16:39:24 -0500 (EST) To: David Rysdam cc: pgsql-interfaces@postgresql.org Subject: Re: Not clear on what PQgetResult does In-reply-to: <437CEB4E.5040402@ll.mit.edu> References: <437CD359.5080908@ll.mit.edu> <451.1132256298@sss.pgh.pa.us> <437CE1B0.3040001@ll.mit.edu> <437CEAC2.6050001@commandprompt.com> <437CEB4E.5040402@ll.mit.edu> Comments: In-reply-to David Rysdam message dated "Thu, 17 Nov 2005 15:42:54 -0500" Date: Thu, 17 Nov 2005 16:39:24 -0500 Message-ID: <8816.1132263564@sss.pgh.pa.us> From: Tom Lane X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at hub.org X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.006 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.006] X-Spam-Score: 0.006 X-Spam-Level: X-Archive-Number: 200511/46 X-Sequence-Number: 5842 David Rysdam writes: > To be honest, this is almost enough to drive me away from PG. But I > like everything else about it, so I could perhaps give a patch a whirl. > Or are there underlying server reasons why this won't work? Have you bothered to read the preceding discussion you were pointed at? http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-interfaces/2005-11/index.php regards, tom lane