X-Original-To: pgsql-interfaces-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org Received: from localhost (av.hub.org [200.46.204.144]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7749E9DC9E3 for ; Sat, 11 Feb 2006 13:39:41 -0400 (AST) Received: from postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (av.hub.org [200.46.204.144]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 62243-06 for ; Sat, 11 Feb 2006 13:39:40 -0400 (AST) X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey- Received: from sss.pgh.pa.us (sss.pgh.pa.us [66.207.139.130]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4F7529DC834 for ; Sat, 11 Feb 2006 13:39:39 -0400 (AST) Received: from sss2.sss.pgh.pa.us (tgl@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sss.pgh.pa.us (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id k1BHdbNC009564; Sat, 11 Feb 2006 12:39:37 -0500 (EST) To: Christoph Zwerschke cc: pgsql-interfaces@postgresql.org Subject: Re: Finding the pqlib version In-reply-to: <43EE066B.7000900@online.de> References: <43EDC399.6060203@online.de> <200602111450.17325.peter_e@gmx.net> <43EE066B.7000900@online.de> Comments: In-reply-to Christoph Zwerschke message dated "Sat, 11 Feb 2006 16:44:43 +0100" Date: Sat, 11 Feb 2006 12:39:37 -0500 Message-ID: <9563.1139679577@sss.pgh.pa.us> From: Tom Lane X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at hub.org X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.109 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.109] X-Spam-Score: 0.109 X-Spam-Level: X-Archive-Number: 200602/30 X-Sequence-Number: 5994 Christoph Zwerschke writes: > Yes, but it will complicate things. I will probably have to use > something like "configure" to do this. So far, this hasn't been > necessary. So I'd prefer a simple hack. Or how would you to this? If you need to deal with more than one version of underlying code, it's time to learn to use configure ... regards, tom lane