pg.ddx.io pgsql-interfaces@postgresql.org mailing list archive
help / color / mirror / Atom feedJDBC compliancy question
3+ messages / 2 participants
[nested] [flat]
* JDBC compliancy question
@ 1999-11-19 22:47 Mads Pultz <mpultz@get2net.dk>
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Mads Pultz @ 1999-11-19 22:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: pgsql-interfaces
Hi.
I've found plenty of mails concerning this question on this mailing-list and
my conclusion was that the postgresql-6.5 JDBC drivers are (fully) JDBC
complaint, JDBC 1.2 and 2. Why then does execution of method jdbcCompliant()
return false? Is my conclusion wrong, is it not fully JDBCx compliant, if
so what features are missing?
Best regards
Mads
^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 3+ messages in thread
* JDBC compliancy question
@ 1999-11-19 23:21 Mads Pultz <mpultz@get2net.dk>
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Mads Pultz @ 1999-11-19 23:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: pgsql-interfaces
Hi.
I've found plenty of mails concerning this question on this mailing-list and
my conclusion was that the postgresql-6.5 JDBC drivers are (fully) JDBC
complaint, JDBC 1.2 and 2. Why then does execution of method jdbcCompliant()
return false? Is my conclusion wrong, is it not fully JDBCx compliant, if
so what features are missing?
Best regards
Mads
^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [INTERFACES] JDBC compliancy question
@ 1999-11-20 11:31 Peter Mount <peter@retep.org.uk>
parent: Mads Pultz <mpultz@get2net.dk>
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Peter Mount @ 1999-11-20 11:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Mads Pultz <mpultz@get2net.dk>; +Cc: pgsql-interfaces
On Sat, 20 Nov 1999, Mads Pultz wrote:
> Hi.
>
> I've found plenty of mails concerning this question on this mailing-list and
> my conclusion was that the postgresql-6.5 JDBC drivers are (fully) JDBC
> complaint, JDBC 1.2 and 2. Why then does execution of method jdbcCompliant()
> return false? Is my conclusion wrong, is it not fully JDBCx compliant, if
> so what features are missing?
The driver is not compliant yet as we have a lot of MetaData methods to
implement.
I'm working at the moment on getting as many of these done for 7.0 (which
is why I'm quiet on the lists at the moment), but until we get everything
done, we can't set jdbcCompliant() to true.
Peter
--
Peter T Mount peter@retep.org.uk
Main Homepage: http://www.retep.org.uk
PostgreSQL JDBC Faq: http://www.retep.org.uk/postgres
Java PDF Generator: http://www.retep.org.uk/pdf
^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~1999-11-20 11:31 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox mbox.gz follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
1999-11-19 22:47 JDBC compliancy question Mads Pultz <mpultz@get2net.dk>
1999-11-19 23:21 JDBC compliancy question Mads Pultz <mpultz@get2net.dk>
1999-11-20 11:31 ` Peter Mount <peter@retep.org.uk>
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox