X-Original-To: pgsql-interfaces@postgresql.org Received: from spampd.localdomain (postgresql.org [64.49.215.8]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B64B8476083 for ; Tue, 8 Apr 2003 05:13:10 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mailhub1.sghms.ac.uk (firewall.sghms.ac.uk [194.82.50.2]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 918E6475E91 for ; Tue, 8 Apr 2003 05:13:07 -0400 (EDT) Received: from [194.82.51.24] (helo=imail) by mailhub1.sghms.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 192pAw-0005ra-00; Tue, 08 Apr 2003 10:13:54 +0100 Received: from [172.16.20.3] (mrc1-003.sghms.ac.uk [172.16.20.3]) by imail.sghms.ac.uk (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.1 HotFix 0.7 (built May 7 2002)) with ESMTPA id <0HD000A0CPK8G3@imail.sghms.ac.uk>; Tue, 08 Apr 2003 10:12:09 +0100 (BST) Date: Tue, 08 Apr 2003 10:10:40 +0100 From: Adam Witney Subject: Re: Release of DBD-pg 1.22 In-reply-to: To: Rudy Lippan Cc: Ian Barwick , pgsql-interfaces , DBD-pg , Bruce Momjian Message-id: MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT User-Agent: Microsoft-Entourage/10.1.1.2418 X-MailScanner-Information: Please contact sysadmin at sghms.ac.uk for more information X-MailScanner-MH1: Found to be clean X-MailScanner-SpamCheck: not spam, SpamAssassin (score=-118.7, required 5, BAYES_01, IN_REP_TO, QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT, USER_AGENT_ENTOURAGE, USER_IN_WHITELIST) X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-18.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_01,IN_REP_TO,QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT,USER_AGENT_ENTOURAGE autolearn=ham version=2.50 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.50 (1.173-2003-02-20-exp) X-Archive-Number: 200304/34 X-Sequence-Number: 3973 > On Mon, 31 Mar 2003, Adam Witney wrote: > >> Yep, there is no trace of is_utf8_string() in perldoc perlapi for 5.6.0 >> > > That sounds about right. > >> Does this mean that my only option is to upgrade perl? Or will the module >> still work without it? > > You can either upgrade perl to 5.6.1 or, if you don't want to upgrade > perl, you can dike out the section of code between the #ifdef and #endif > and then it should work (might fail some UTF-8 test). I would recommed > upgrading perl, however. Ok, I have upgraded to perl 5.6.1, but now make test gives this ..... t/03bind............ok t/04execute.........ok 9/13*** malloc[20356]: error for object 0x235c20: Incorrect checksum for freed object - object was probably modified after being freed; break at szone_error *** malloc[20356]: error for object 0x235c20: Incorrect checksum for freed object - object was probably modified after being freed; break at szone_error t/04execute.........dubious Test returned status 0 (wstat 11, 0xb) DIED. FAILED tests 10-13 Failed 4/13 tests, 69.23% okay t/05fetch...........ok, 3/10 skipped: need Encode module for unicode tests t/06disconnect......ok t/07reuse...........ok t/08txn.............ok t/09autocommit......ok t/11quoting.........ok t/12placeholders....ok t/13pgtype..........ok t/15funct...........ok 4/59Argument "7.3.2" isn't numeric in numeric lt (<) at blib/lib/DBD/Pg.pm line 701. t/15funct...........ok 5/59Argument "7.3.2" isn't numeric in numeric lt (<) at blib/lib/DBD/Pg.pm line 203. t/15funct...........ok 6/59Argument "7.3.2" isn't numeric in numeric lt (<) at blib/lib/DBD/Pg.pm line 808. t/15funct...........ok 25/59Argument "7.3.2" isn't numeric in numeric lt (<) at blib/lib/DBD/Pg.pm line 701. t/15funct...........ok 26/59Argument "7.3.2" isn't numeric in numeric lt (<) at blib/lib/DBD/Pg.pm line 701. t/15funct...........ok 28/59Argument "7.3.2" isn't numeric in numeric lt (<) at blib/lib/DBD/Pg.pm line 605. t/15funct...........ok 31/59Argument "7.3.2" isn't numeric in numeric lt (<) at blib/lib/DBD/Pg.pm line 701. t/15funct...........ok 32/59Argument "7.3.2" isn't numeric in numeric lt (<) at blib/lib/DBD/Pg.pm line 701. t/15funct...........ok 33/59Argument "7.3.2" isn't numeric in numeric lt (<) at blib/lib/DBD/Pg.pm line 701. t/15funct...........ok 34/59Argument "7.3.2" isn't numeric in numeric lt (<) at blib/lib/DBD/Pg.pm line 701. t/15funct...........ok 35/59Argument "7.3.2" isn't numeric in numeric lt (<) at blib/lib/DBD/Pg.pm line 701. t/15funct...........ok 36/59Argument "7.3.2" isn't numeric in numeric lt (<) at blib/lib/DBD/Pg.pm line 701. t/15funct...........ok 37/59Argument "7.3.2" isn't numeric in numeric lt (<) at blib/lib/DBD/Pg.pm line 203. t/15funct...........ok 38/59Argument "7.3.2" isn't numeric in numeric lt (<) at blib/lib/DBD/Pg.pm line 203. t/15funct...........ok 39/59Argument "7.3.2" isn't numeric in numeric lt (<) at blib/lib/DBD/Pg.pm line 203. t/15funct...........ok 40/59Argument "7.3.2" isn't numeric in numeric lt (<) at blib/lib/DBD/Pg.pm line 203. t/15funct...........ok 41/59Argument "7.3.2" isn't numeric in numeric lt (<) at blib/lib/DBD/Pg.pm line 203. t/15funct...........ok 42/59Argument "7.3.2" isn't numeric in numeric lt (<) at blib/lib/DBD/Pg.pm line 203. t/15funct...........ok 43/59Argument "7.3.2" isn't numeric in numeric lt (<) at blib/lib/DBD/Pg.pm line 203. t/15funct...........ok 44/59Argument "7.3.2" isn't numeric in numeric lt (<) at blib/lib/DBD/Pg.pm line 203. t/15funct...........ok 45/59Argument "7.3.2" isn't numeric in numeric lt (<) at blib/lib/DBD/Pg.pm line 203. t/15funct...........ok 46/59Argument "7.3.2" isn't numeric in numeric lt (<) at blib/lib/DBD/Pg.pm line 203. t/15funct...........ok 47/59Argument "7.3.2" isn't numeric in numeric lt (<) at blib/lib/DBD/Pg.pm line 203. t/15funct...........ok 48/59Argument "7.3.2" isn't numeric in numeric lt (<) at blib/lib/DBD/Pg.pm line 203. t/15funct...........ok 49/59Argument "7.3.2" isn't numeric in numeric lt (<) at blib/lib/DBD/Pg.pm line 203. t/15funct...........ok 50/59Argument "7.3.2" isn't numeric in numeric lt (<) at blib/lib/DBD/Pg.pm line 203. t/15funct...........ok 53/59Argument "7.3.2" isn't numeric in numeric lt (<) at blib/lib/DBD/Pg.pm line 291. t/15funct...........ok 54/59Argument "7.3.2" isn't numeric in numeric lt (<) at blib/lib/DBD/Pg.pm line 291. t/15funct...........ok 56/59Argument "7.3.2" isn't numeric in numeric lt (<) at blib/lib/DBD/Pg.pm line 291. t/15funct...........ok, 7/59 skipped: various reasons t/99cleanup.........ok Failed Test Status Wstat Total Fail Failed List of Failed ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- ---- t/04execute.t 0 11 13 4 30.77% 10-13 10 subtests skipped. Failed 1/17 test scripts, 94.12% okay. 4/186 subtests failed, 97.85% okay. make: *** [test_dynamic] Error 255 Any ideas whats happening now? Thanks Adam -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.