X-Original-To: pgsql-interfaces-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.204.144]) by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7E1A38B9E4C; Thu, 3 Feb 2005 08:58:29 +0000 (GMT) Received: from svr1.postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (av.hub.org [200.46.204.144]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 11104-01; Thu, 3 Feb 2005 08:58:21 +0000 (GMT) Received: from melon.pingpong.net (82.milagro.bahnhof.net [195.178.168.82]) by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D92578B9E02; Thu, 3 Feb 2005 08:58:21 +0000 (GMT) Received: from localhost (localhost.pingpong.net [127.0.0.1]) by melon.pingpong.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id B37434AC2E; Thu, 3 Feb 2005 09:58:20 +0100 (CET) Received: from melon.pingpong.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (melon.pingpong.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 34911-05-10; Thu, 3 Feb 2005 09:58:20 +0100 (CET) Received: from [192.168.1.187] (81.milagro.bahnhof.net [195.178.168.81]) by melon.pingpong.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8E9204AC28; Thu, 3 Feb 2005 09:58:20 +0100 (CET) Date: Thu, 03 Feb 2005 09:58:19 +0100 From: Palle Girgensohn To: Peter Eisentraut Cc: pgsql-interfaces@postgresql.org, pgsql-odbc@postgresql.org Subject: Re: [ODBC] odbc.sql? Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <200502030753.49150.peter_e@gmx.net> References: <1F79063122826BB415E75358@palle.girgensohn.se> <200502030753.49150.peter_e@gmx.net> X-Mailer: Mulberry/3.1.6 (Linux/x86) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at pingpong.net X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at hub.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.521 tagged_above=0 required=5 tests=AWL, FORGED_RCVD_HELO X-Spam-Level: X-Archive-Number: 200502/6 X-Sequence-Number: 5251 --On torsdag, februari 03, 2005 07.53.48 +0100 Peter Eisentraut wrote: > Palle Girgensohn wrote: >> If so, isn't the file really tucked away too deeply - IMO it is not >> part of the odbc client code, or at least it should also be >> distributed with the more used psqlODBC project, right? > > It is distributed with psqlODBC. Well, maybe it is, but then how come it's not in the cvs repository? /Palle