Received: from orange.csi.cam.ac.uk (exim@orange.csi.cam.ac.uk [131.111.8.77]) by hub.org (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id QAA87032 for ; Mon, 29 Nov 1999 16:28:14 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from ewan@cam.ac.uk) Received: from cmor.chu.cam.ac.uk ([131.111.202.213] helo=cam.ac.uk) by orange.csi.cam.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 3.03 #1) id 11sYLC-0004kM-00; Mon, 29 Nov 1999 21:28:11 +0000 Date: Mon, 29 Nov 1999 21:29:56 +0000 (GMT) From: eem21@cam.ac.uk Reply-To: eem21@cam.ac.uk Subject: Re: [INTERFACES] libpq + multiple connections ... To: scrappy@hub.org cc: pgsql-interfaces@postgresql.org, tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/plain; CHARSET=US-ASCII Message-Id: On 29 Nov, The Hermit Hacker wrote: > On Mon, 29 Nov 1999 eem21@cam.ac.uk wrote: > >> On 29 Nov, The Hermit Hacker wrote: >> > >> > Is this something that could *safely* be back-patched to a v6.5.4 release? >> >> Well, it's not _supposed_ to have changed the behaviour for existing >> functions. However, there's been quite a lot of chopping and changing, >> and I might have lost something somewhere. That said, it would be of >> great help to me if it made it into a 6.5.x release, and I would thus >> be willing to test it. I can only test ix86/Linux, unfortunately. >> When would it be released, if that were the case? > > If you can get a patch in so that we can test it I'm doin' it, I'm doin' it... ;-) > would love to get a release out by ... oh ... end of week? :) > > Anyone object overly? Nope. > [Snip async functions] Ewan.