Received: from localhost (postgresql.org [64.49.215.8])
	by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5A3C5475EE1
	for <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>;
	Sun, 12 Jan 2003 11:10:10 -0500 (EST)
Received: from sd.tpf.co.jp (sd.tpf.co.jp [210.161.239.34])
	by postgresql.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 0C441475E71
	for <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>;
	Sun, 12 Jan 2003 11:10:09 -0500 (EST)
Received: (qmail 5825 invoked from network); 12 Jan 2003 16:10:12 -0000
X-Authentication: inoue was authenticated by sd.tpf.co.jp
	at  12 Jan 2003 16:10:12 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO mcadnote1) (219.61.40.16)
	by sd.tpf.co.jp with SMTP; 12 Jan 2003 16:10:12 -0000
From: "Hiroshi Inoue" <Inoue@tpf.co.jp>
To: "Tom Lane" <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Cc: "Bruce Momjian" <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>,
	<pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Subject: Re: MOVE LAST: why?
Date: Mon, 13 Jan 2003 01:12:19 +0900
Message-ID: <EKEJJICOHDIEMGPNIFIJKEBGKFAA.Inoue@tpf.co.jp>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-2022-jp"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0)
In-Reply-To: <3E1CEA18.18E921A0@tpf.co.jp>
Importance: Normal
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000
X-Virus-Scanned: by AMaViS new-20020517
X-Archive-Number: 200301/529
X-Sequence-Number: 34139

> Honestly I'm not so enthusiastic about scrollable cursors.
> Even though PostgreSQL provides an efficient scrollable
> cursor, I would use it little unless it could survive
> across transactions.
> 
> Anyway it's too bad that FETCH LAST means FETCH ALL.

I would remove LAST, RELATIVE and SCROLL keywords
for cursor related operations if there's no objection.

regards, 
Hiroshi Inoue