Received: from localhost (postgresql.org [64.49.215.8]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 21C10475CA9 for ; Fri, 30 Aug 2002 11:45:21 -0400 (EDT) Received: from thing.verysmall.org (thing.verysmall.org [212.100.226.116]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with SMTP id B512D475843 for ; Fri, 30 Aug 2002 11:45:19 -0400 (EDT) Received: (qmail 82760 invoked from network); 30 Aug 2002 15:46:27 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO iavor) (62.178.43.123) by thing.verysmall.org with SMTP; 30 Aug 2002 15:46:27 -0000 From: "Iavor Raytchev" To: "pgsql-hackers" , "pgsql-interfaces" Subject: pgaccess - where to store the own data Date: Fri, 30 Aug 2002 17:44:12 +0200 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2911.0) X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000 Importance: Normal X-Virus-Scanned: by AMaViS new-20020517 X-Archive-Number: 200208/89 X-Sequence-Number: 3051 Hello everybody, There is an open question we need broad opinion on. Currently pgaccess stores its own data in the database it works with. Some people do not like that. To store it elsewhere invokes a number of issues such as: - where is this somewhere - converting form all versions to the new - etc. What do people think about this. Is it so bad that the own data is stored in the database pgaccess works with? Iavor -- www.pgaccess.org