X-Original-To: pgsql-interfaces@postgresql.org
Received: from spampd.localdomain (postgresql.org [64.49.215.8])
	by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BE6CD475C98
	for <pgsql-interfaces@postgresql.org>;
	Tue, 25 Mar 2003 11:03:53 -0500 (EST)
Received: from amer-mta01.csc.com (amer-mta01.csc.com [20.137.2.247])
	by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 131E2474E44
	for <pgsql-interfaces@postgresql.org>;
	Tue, 25 Mar 2003 11:03:43 -0500 (EST)
Received: from amer-mta01.csc.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by amer-mta01.csc.com (Switch-2.2.5/Switch-2.2.0) with ESMTP id
	h2PG4eN22444; Tue, 25 Mar 2003 11:04:40 -0500 (EST)
Received: from csc.com (va-fch32.csc.com [20.6.39.233])
	by amer-mta01.csc.com (Switch-2.2.5/Switch-2.2.0) with ESMTP id
	h2PFNEN08752; Tue, 25 Mar 2003 10:23:14 -0500 (EST)
Subject: Re: Interaction between Cursor and Transaction storage?
To: pgsql-interfaces@postgresql.org
Cc: Christoph Haller <ch@rodos.fzk.de>
X-Mailer: Lotus Notes Release 5.0.6a  January 17, 2001
Message-ID: <OF906CBED8.1BBD62CC-ON85256CF4.0053AD09@com>
From: "William West" <wwest@csc.com>
Date: Tue, 25 Mar 2003 10:19:33 -0500
X-MIMETrack: Serialize by Router on VA-FCH32/SRV/CSC(Release 5.0.11  |July 24,
	2002) at 03/25/2003 10:19:38 AM
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.1 required=5.0
	tests=BAYES_20
	version=2.50
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.50 (1.173-2003-02-20-exp)
X-Archive-Number: 200303/149
X-Sequence-Number: 3898


Thanks, Christoph.

Those were the answers I wanted.