Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2004 19:57:29 -0500 (EST)
From: "C. Maj" <cmaj@freedomcorpse.info>
To: pgsql-interfaces@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: Need new project admin for unbundled Tcl interface
In-Reply-To: <4034CC13.5070406@Yahoo.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.56.0402191934210.6455@screw>
References: <200402180357.i1I3vZK02711@candle.pha.pa.us>
	<20473.1077078838@sss.pgh.pa.us> <4034CC13.5070406@Yahoo.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII

On Thu, 19 Feb 2004, Jan Wieck waxed:

8<'s

>  From a pure technical point of view I understand that ljb has produced 
> a merge of both versions and even worked forward from there already. If 
> there isn't any substantial work in the pipeline of the gborg project, 
> that we don't see yet and which to present or announce would be the 
> right time now, I think that fork has a good chance to succeed.

Besides this thread being half-on and half-off the
interfaces list, I think the only *problem* is that libpgtcl
never got removed from the core.  If libpgtcl were only a
gborg project, then maybe this wouldn't be such a mess.
Instead, it is a mess, because people were getting upset that
two forks of libpgtcl (gborg and core) were not kept in sync.

Now they are sync'd, so why make a third fork ?  Destroy the
core libpgtcl and apply the patch to the gborg version.


-- 

Chris Maj <cmaj_hat_freedomcorpse_hot_info>
Pronunciation Guide:  Maj == May
Fingerprint: 43D6 799C F6CF F920 6623  DC85 C8A3 CFFE F0DE C146