From: Gerhard Hintermayer <g.hintermayer@inode.at>
Subject: Re: still memory leaks with libpgtcl
Date: Fri, 27 Dec 2002 16:03:01 +0100
Organization: Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org)
Lines: 35
Message-ID: <auhq8v$2iuo$1@news.hub.org>
References: <as0da6$2njk$1@news.hub.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.2.1) Gecko/20021130
In-Reply-To: <as0da6$2njk$1@news.hub.org>
To: pgsql-interfaces@postgresql.org

Gerhard Hintermayer wrote:
> Weird, I thought these were fixed already.
> 
> Downloaded 7.2.3 source today, was *a lot* astonished, that the 
> pg_on_connection_loss and the fix for finding a free connection slot 
> (PSetResultId)  were not in the source tarball.
> Fetched latest versions from CVS (both patches included), compiled tcl 
> 8.3.5 and did
> 
> set conn [pg_connect template1]
> pg_disconnect $conn
> 
> in an endless loop, which result's in a constant increase in memory usage.
> Has anybody encountered this problem also ?
> 
> What went wrong here - the sources in the tarball are oviously old (I 
> submitted 2 patches several month ago, one was a bug fix, ok the other 
> was an enhancement, but can anybody explain, why at least the bug fix 
> did *not* find it's way to the tarball , and why are there 2 projects in 
> parallel - libpgtcl and the pgtcl project - that is only confusing people.
> 
> Has anyone experience with pgtcl project, it is still beta, and I'm in a 
> production environment, so I need really stable stuff.
> 
> Gerhard
> 

Is there absoulutely noone using postgreSQL with tcl/tk ? I cannot beleave that. 
I'd be happy to hear at least the preferred pgtcl sources -either from the 
postgreSQL sources of from the pgtcl project. And what's the differences ?

-- 
Gerhard Hintermayer
http://www.inode.at/g.hintermayer