Received: from shaked.cc.openu.ac.il (shaked.cc.openu.ac.il [147.233.145.65]) by hub.org (8.8.8/8.7.5) with ESMTP id GAA29089; Wed, 15 Jul 1998 06:04:32 -0400 (EDT) Received: from [147.233.159.109] (herouth@mac-herouth.pc.openu.ac.il [147.233.159.109]) by shaked.cc.openu.ac.il (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id NAA13635; Wed, 15 Jul 1998 13:04:27 +0300 (IDT) X-Sender: herouth@shaked.cc.openu.ac.il Message-Id: In-Reply-To: <199807141537.LAA24391@candle.pha.pa.us> References: <35AB74A9.C44976E5@apop-server.alumni.caltech.edu> from "Thomas G. Lockhart" at "Jul 14, 1998 3: 9:29 pm" Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Date: Wed, 15 Jul 1998 13:04:26 +0300 To: hackers@postgreSQL.org, pgsql-general@postgreSQL.org From: Herouth Maoz Subject: Re: [INTERFACES][HACKERS] atttypmod now 32 bits, interface change At 18:37 +0300 on 14/7/98, Bruce Momjian wrote: > The days where every release fixed server crashes, or added a feature > that users were 'screaming for' may be a thing of the past. We are > nearing a maturity stage, where we can focus on performance, > documenation, features, and cleanup. The days when we have a 'major' > feature may be fewer, because we have added 'most' of the major features > people have been asking for. Except row-level locking, referential integrity and PL/SQL... Just an example of major features yet to be implemented (speaking from the point of view of a user who doesn't know what the plans are for 6.4, of course). Herouth (PS. This thread doesn't really have anything to do with the interfaces list, does it? I redirected the crosspost to "general".) -- Herouth Maoz, Internet developer. Open University of Israel - Telem project http://telem.openu.ac.il/~herutma