Received: from cook.onecert.fr (cook.onecert.fr [134.212.189.43]) by hub.org
	(8.8.8/8.7.5) with SMTP id KAA23288 for
	<pgsql-interfaces@postgreSQL.org>;
	Wed, 12 Aug 1998 10:05:52 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (qmail 3277 invoked by uid 501); 12 Aug 1998 14:04:08 -0000
Sender: ecm@cook.onecert.fr
To: pgsql-interfaces@postgreSQL.org
Subject: Re: [INTERFACES] Re: thread-safe libpq and DBD::Pg
References: <26919.902847103@sss.pgh.pa.us>
X-Eric-Conspiracy: there is no conspiracy.
X-Attribution: ecm
X-Home-Page: http://www.chez.com/emarsden/
Reply-To: emarsden@mail.dotcom.fr
From: Eric Marsden <emarsden@mail.dotcom.fr>
Date: 12 Aug 1998 16:04:07 +0200
In-Reply-To: Tom Lane's message of "Tue, 11 Aug 1998 10:51:43 -0400"
Message-ID: <m267fye1pk.fsf@cook.onecert.fr>
Lines: 13
X-Mailer: Gnus v5.6.22/Emacs 19.34

>>>>> "TL" == Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> writes:

  TL> I think I remember someone speculating about writing a pure Tcl
  TL> front end by programming directly to the socket-level FE/BE interface,
  TL> but I haven't heard about any results.

Can the FE/BE interface be expected to remain stable over time? As
much so as libpq?

-- 
Eric Marsden
emarsden @ mail.dotcom.fr
It's elephants all the way down