Received: from thor.candleweb.no (thor.candleweb.no [195.139.160.194])
	by mail.postgresql.org (8.11.1/8.11.1) with ESMTP id f0OG7bq25364
	for <pgsql-interfaces@postgresql.org>;
	Wed, 24 Jan 2001 11:07:37 -0500 (EST)
	(envelope-from gunnar@candleweb.no)
Received: (from gunnar@localhost) by thor.candleweb.no (8.10.0/8.10.0/on4)
	id <f0OG28W27525>; Wed, 24 Jan 2001 17:02:08 +0100 (MET)
To: Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>
Cc: Peter T Mount <peter@retep.org.uk>,
 "Gunnar R|nning" <gunnar@candleweb.no>,
	Barry Lind <barry@xythos.com>, pgsql-interfaces@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: Re: [PATCHES] Re: Fixes and enhancements to JDBC driver (take 2)
References: <200101241413.JAA14544@candle.pha.pa.us>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (generated by tm-edit 7.106)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
From: Gunnar R|nning <gunnar@candleweb.no>
Date: 24 Jan 2001 17:02:08 +0100
In-Reply-To: Bruce Momjian's message of "Wed,
 24 Jan 2001 09:13:58 -0500 (EST)"
Message-ID: <x6hf2p6irj.fsf@thor.candleweb.no>
Lines: 16
X-Mailer: Gnus v5.4.65/Emacs 19.34
X-Archive-Number: 200101/282
X-Sequence-Number: 903

Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> writes:

> Gunnar, everyone, can people check the CVS or snapshot and make sure you
> are happy.  This has been a confusing item for me, and I want to make
> sure we have it working as intended.
> 

The code in CVS is the correct version - including some rearrangements by
Peter. I still think we should have the byte[] pooling as a config option,
because it is not obvious that it will help performance on all platforms -
it depends on the JVM implementation you use. 

regards, 

	Gunnar