Received: from thor.candleweb.no (thor.candleweb.no [195.139.160.194])
	by hub.org (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id HAA76864
	for <pgsql-interfaces@postgresql.org>;
	Wed, 24 May 2000 07:42:32 -0400 (EDT)
	(envelope-from gunnar@candleweb.no)
Received: (from gunnar@localhost) by thor.candleweb.no (8.10.0/8.10.0/on4)
	id <e4OBQ1f06248>; Wed, 24 May 2000 13:26:01 +0200 (MET DST)
To: pgsql-interfaces@postgresql.org
Subject: JDBC escape processing
Mime-Version: 1.0 (generated by tm-edit 7.106)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
From: Gunnar R|nning <gunnar@candleweb.no>
Date: 24 May 2000 13:26:00 +0200
Message-ID: <x6r9as9ol3.fsf@thor.candleweb.no>
Lines: 16
X-Mailer: Gnus v5.4.65/Emacs 19.34
X-Archive-Number: 200005/39

Hi, 

I noticed that JDBC escape processing is not yet implemented by the JDBC
driver. Is anybody working on this, or should I just go for PostgreSQL
specific implementations for now ?

The reason for my last couple of requests is that I'm porting an
application from another commercial database to PostgreSQL. The results so
far is looking very good indeed. I think(and hope) I'm going to gain both
speed and stability by going to PostgreSQL. On top of that my customer will
get a system that is more flexible when it comes to development and
deployment. 

Regards, 

	Gunnar