Received: from thor.candleweb.no (thor.candleweb.no [195.139.160.194])
	by hub.org (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id GAA58376
	for <pgsql-interfaces@postgresql.org>;
	Sun, 28 May 2000 06:59:24 -0400 (EDT)
	(envelope-from gunnar@candleweb.no)
Received: (from gunnar@localhost) by thor.candleweb.no (8.10.0/8.10.0/on4)
	id <e4SAg3w29262>; Sun, 28 May 2000 12:42:03 +0200 (MET DST)
To: Janossy Gergely <gjano@freemail.hu>
Cc: pgsql-interfaces@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: jdbc driver: Why it isn't jdbcCompliant?
References: <00052701341103.02227@azul>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (generated by tm-edit 7.106)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
From: Gunnar R|nning <gunnar@candleweb.no>
Date: 28 May 2000 12:42:03 +0200
In-Reply-To: Janossy Gergely's message of "Sat, 27 May 2000 01:26:31 +0200"
Message-ID: <x6snv3ot1g.fsf@thor.candleweb.no>
Lines: 18
X-Mailer: Gnus v5.4.65/Emacs 19.34
X-Archive-Number: 200005/76

Janossy Gergely <gjano@freemail.hu> writes:

> Hi! 
> 
> I'm using Sun JDK 1.2.2 and tried to use the pgsql interface with postgresql
> 6.x and 7.0 as well. I couldn't use any of the interfaces because
> the method Driver.jdbcCompliant() is always false. Even with mysql driver.

Hi Janossy, 

I guess this only means that the driver doesn't implement all the
interfaces according to the JDBC specification. But it works fine for most
applications as long you not are depending on esoteric(or special)
features. In fact I'm very satisfied with it for an JDBC based web application
I ported this week to PostgreSQL. I'm also running Sun JDK 1.2.2 as you do.

regards, 
	Gunnar