Received: from thor.candleweb.no (thor.candleweb.no [195.139.160.194])
	by hub.org (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id FAA45398;
	Fri, 26 May 2000 05:53:30 -0400 (EDT)
	(envelope-from gunnar@candleweb.no)
Received: (from gunnar@localhost) by thor.candleweb.no (8.10.0/8.10.0/on4)
	id <e4Q9adg25020>; Fri, 26 May 2000 11:36:39 +0200 (MET DST)
To: Peter Mount <petermount@it.maidstone.gov.uk>
Cc: "'Gunnar R|nning'" <gunnar@candleweb.no>, pgsql-interfaces@postgresql.org,
	"PostgreSQL Developers List (E-mail)" <hackers@postgresql.org>
Subject: Re: Postgresql 7.0 JDBC exceptions - broken connecti 	ons ?
References: 
 <1B3D5E532D18D311861A00600865478CF1AE65@exchange1.nt.maidstone.gov.uk>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (generated by tm-edit 7.106)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
From: Gunnar R|nning <gunnar@candleweb.no>
Date: 26 May 2000 11:36:38 +0200
In-Reply-To: Peter Mount's message of "Fri, 26 May 2000 09:08:28 +0100"
Message-ID: <x6snv5vejd.fsf@thor.candleweb.no>
Lines: 23
X-Mailer: Gnus v5.4.65/Emacs 19.34
X-Archive-Number: 200005/64

Peter Mount <petermount@it.maidstone.gov.uk> writes:

> PM: How long is it before the problem starts? I'm wondering if the
> problem is because the backend is sitting there for a long period.

The problem started after the connections had been for about 16 hours or
so. So this could be the problem. 

However yesterday I restarted my database with some new options to do more
logging and also print some debug information. I haven't seen any of the
exceptions I reported  yesterday in the past 20 hours after the restart.

> Unknown Response Type u
> 
> PM: Does anyone [on Hackers] know what the u code is for? The fact it's
> in lower case tells me that the protocol/connection got broken somehow.

I got a lot of these errors and the response type varied between different
characters, so your theory seems plausible.

Regards, 

	Gunnar