Message-ID: <8d8ea6c9-85a6-d1b8-309d-b1f5bc590840@cloud.gatewaynet.com>
Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2023 11:59:57 +0300
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: Re: Regarding useObjects
Content-Language: en-US
To: Vladimir Sitnikov <sitnikov.vladimir@gmail.com>
Cc: pgsql-jdbc@postgresql.org
References: <f81c70bd-586e-79ab-d089-331696acc42a@cloud.gatewaynet.com>
 <CAB=Je-HiDQ_pSp5PTfuRUEt6WA5bNNgYWS_8Q6wUHO1qg4=RFQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <d92c73eb-3f65-f455-8a30-d4d0ed71c1e0@cloud.gatewaynet.com>
 <CAB=Je-G=X8UbhjB5HF8d9WS5eZdVUgqopvsocD5_0WpxOHcAyw@mail.gmail.com>
From: Achilleas Mantzios - cloud <a.mantzios@cloud.gatewaynet.com>
In-Reply-To: 
 <CAB=Je-G=X8UbhjB5HF8d9WS5eZdVUgqopvsocD5_0WpxOHcAyw@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: 
 <https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/8d8ea6c9-85a6-d1b8-309d-b1f5bc590840%40cloud.gatewaynet.com>
Precedence: bulk

Good Day Vladimir

On 9/27/23 09:03, Vladimir Sitnikov wrote:
>> so there was the option to change this to false and recompile
> We try doing our best to keep backward compatibility both
> compilation-wise and behaviour-wise.
> However, we treat "private fields and methods" as private, and we do
> not expect people would depend on them.
> If you have to modify sources or depend on private APIs I would
> suggest raising an issue or PR so it could be incorporated
> into the driver itself.
>
> Would you please provide a test case of what you are doing with PgArray?
> What is exactly the sequence of JDBC calls, the actual and the
> expected outcomes in your case?

E.g. for the case of floats, we have to change all:

java.sql.Array arr = rs.getArray(1);

Object objarr = arr.getArray();

float flarr[] = (float[]) objarr;

to

java.sql.Array arr = rs.getArray(1);

Object objarr = arr.getArray();

Float flarr[] = (Float[]) objarr;

>
> The mentioned "useObjects" has been removed in
> https://github.com/pgjdbc/pgjdbc/pull/1194 (Refactor decoding arrays)
>
> Vladimir