Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1tkFUG-001q5m-GN for pgsql-novice@arkaria.postgresql.org; Tue, 18 Feb 2025 04:45:36 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=malur.postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1tkFUE-006Yiw-QQ for pgsql-novice@arkaria.postgresql.org; Tue, 18 Feb 2025 04:45:34 +0000 Received: from makus.postgresql.org ([2001:4800:3e1:1::229]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1tkFUE-006YiW-Hh for pgsql-novice@lists.postgresql.org; Tue, 18 Feb 2025 04:45:34 +0000 Received: from sss.pgh.pa.us ([68.162.161.243]) by makus.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from ) id 1tkFUC-001S1o-1X for pgsql-novice@postgresql.org; Tue, 18 Feb 2025 04:45:33 +0000 Received: from sss1.sss.pgh.pa.us (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sss.pgh.pa.us (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 51I4jRwQ1168233; Mon, 17 Feb 2025 23:45:27 -0500 From: Tom Lane To: Hugo Sousa cc: "pgsql-novice@postgresql.org" Subject: Re: Tracing in PostgreSQL with Extended Query Protocol In-reply-to: <3F83A3E0-E412-412C-B0F2-9D6C4A19FDF2@hotmail.com> References: <3F83A3E0-E412-412C-B0F2-9D6C4A19FDF2@hotmail.com> Comments: In-reply-to Hugo Sousa message dated "Mon, 17 Feb 2025 22:52:23 +0000" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-ID: <1168231.1739853927.1@sss.pgh.pa.us> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Date: Mon, 17 Feb 2025 23:45:27 -0500 Message-ID: <1168232.1739853927@sss.pgh.pa.us> List-Id: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Owner: List-Archive: Archived-At: Precedence: bulk Hugo Sousa writes: > However, we make heavy use of the extended query protocol, and from > my understanding, SQL comments don’t work in that context. Why do you think that? regards, tom lane