MIME-Version: 1.0
From: Sherman Willden <sherman.willden@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 21 Jun 2025 21:59:24 -0600
Message-ID: 
 <CAFWhtBV5VKnsXTchJ1LEnLnTi4p8fc+wZk4YedTZFZrdDAJSoA@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: RE: Postgresql not acting like I think it should
To: pgsql-novice@lists.postgresql.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000a30a140638211fa9"
Archived-At: 
 <https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CAFWhtBV5VKnsXTchJ1LEnLnTi4p8fc%2BwZk4YedTZFZrdDAJSoA%40mail.gmail.com>
Precedence: bulk

--000000000000a30a140638211fa9
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"

I am the one who said that the postgresql I was using didn't act like any
other one I have used before. Nothing seemed to fix it. Then I performed ls
-C only to get a single column. So something really bad had happened. I
reloaded Ubuntu 24.04 and now postgresql and ls are performing as
advertised. I don't know what I did to my machine but it seemed totally
messed up before I reloaded it. I am so glad that I have a very good files
backup system. Thanks to all that replied to my first post.

Sherman

--000000000000a30a140638211fa9
Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<div dir=3D"ltr"><div>I am the one who said that the postgresql I was using=
 didn&#39;t act like any other one I have used before. Nothing seemed to fi=
x it. Then I performed ls -C only to get a single column. So something real=
ly bad had happened. I reloaded Ubuntu 24.04 and now postgresql and ls are =
performing as advertised. I don&#39;t know what I did to my machine but it =
seemed totally messed up before I reloaded it. I am so glad that I have a v=
ery good files backup system. Thanks to all that replied to my first post.<=
/div><div><br></div><div>Sherman</div></div>

--000000000000a30a140638211fa9--