Message-ID: <d43261aba0d82fad7d890b4f2992072ab9f5dab1.camel@cybertec.at>
Subject: Re: Naming projects for Postgresql ONLY.
From: Laurenz Albe <laurenz.albe@cybertec.at>
To: Jean Baro <jfbaro@gmail.com>, pgsql-novice@lists.postgresql.org
Date: Wed, 17 Nov 2021 16:42:05 +0100
In-Reply-To: 
 <CA+fQeekdik2ydLEKfdaJSUgbnTnfv1uYrWJPnnsz--53pNByBA@mail.gmail.com>
References: 
	<CA+fQeekdik2ydLEKfdaJSUgbnTnfv1uYrWJPnnsz--53pNByBA@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
User-Agent: Evolution 3.40.4 (3.40.4-2.fc34) 
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: 
 <https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/d43261aba0d82fad7d890b4f2992072ab9f5dab1.camel%40cybertec.at>
Precedence: bulk

On Tue, 2021-11-16 at 13:39 -0300, Jean Baro wrote:
> I am working on a project for PERSON (Lead, Prospect and Customer) deduplication that
> is done using 100% Postgresql capabilities (and its standard extensions present in AWS,
> GCP and Azure as well). Once extensively tested and robust enough I am planning on
> releasing it as Open Source (probably under PG License). 
> 
> To ensure people looking into this know it's a Postgresql only solution I was considering naming it pg_person_dedupe or something on those lines.
> 
> Please, am I allowed to use pg_** as the name of this open source project?

I see no problem with that.

Yours,
Laurenz Albe
-- 
Cybertec | https://www.cybertec-postgresql.com