MIME-Version: 1.0
References: 
 <CAA_1=93z4oEXKQ9GHtDkEQhEe5r39C8YSDMpwO8OHmSBreXw3g@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: 
 <CAA_1=93z4oEXKQ9GHtDkEQhEe5r39C8YSDMpwO8OHmSBreXw3g@mail.gmail.com>
From: Brad White <b55white@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2023 16:58:48 -0600
Message-ID: 
 <CAA_1=90L6sd=+Jp1HVUoOQX8fHMotHRftfc_2Gs1L7syE678qQ@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Quoting issue from ODBC
To: "pgsql-generallists.postgresql.org" <pgsql-general@lists.postgresql.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000be9b6205f4b0e8e6"
Archived-At: 
 <https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CAA_1%3D90L6sd%3D%2BJp1HVUoOQX8fHMotHRftfc_2Gs1L7syE678qQ%40mail.gmail.com>
Precedence: bulk

--000000000000be9b6205f4b0e8e6
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

> Are these UPDATE's actually necessary?
> In other words has nobody noticed a problem with the data over that time
frame?

I don't know what to make of it.
I had the same question you did.

I now have proof that these hundreds of errors are not an issue.
The postgres logs in pg_log clearly show an error, but the errors never
show up in the Access log.
That means that Access didn't get an error back.
Further, I have evidence that the values are actually getting updated.
The financial balances are all correct.
Issues that were closed are all closed, etc.
Even though the Access log says the statement was only run once and
Postgres says ERROR, I see no other evidence of it.
I can't fathom how that can happen.

=C2=AF\_(=E3=83=84)_/=C2=AF

On the other hand, there are some real errors in the log. I'll put that in
another post.

Brad

--000000000000be9b6205f4b0e8e6
Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<div dir=3D"ltr"><div dir=3D"ltr">&gt; Are these UPDATE&#39;s actually nece=
ssary?<br>&gt; In other words has nobody noticed a problem with the data ov=
er that time frame?</div><div dir=3D"ltr"><br></div><div>I don&#39;t know w=
hat to make of it.</div><div>I had the same question you did.</div><div><br=
></div><div>I now have proof that these hundreds of errors are not an issue=
.</div><div>The postgres logs in pg_log clearly show an error, but the erro=
rs never show up in the Access log.</div><div>That means that Access didn&#=
39;t get an error back.</div><div>Further, I have evidence=C2=A0that the=C2=
=A0values are actually getting updated.</div><div>The financial=C2=A0balanc=
es are all correct.</div><div>Issues that were closed are all closed, etc.=
=C2=A0</div><div>Even though the Access log says the statement=C2=A0was onl=
y run once and Postgres says ERROR, I see no other evidence of it.</div><di=
v>I can&#39;t fathom how that can happen.</div><div><br></div><div><span st=
yle=3D"color:rgb(46,71,93);font-family:&quot;Lexend Deca&quot;,sans-serif;f=
ont-size:18px">=C2=AF\_(=E3=83=84)_/=C2=AF</span><br></div><div><span style=
=3D"color:rgb(46,71,93);font-family:&quot;Lexend Deca&quot;,sans-serif;font=
-size:18px"><br></span></div><div><span style=3D"color:rgb(46,71,93);font-f=
amily:&quot;Lexend Deca&quot;,sans-serif">On the other hand, there are some=
 real errors=C2=A0in the log. I&#39;ll put that in another post.</span></di=
v><div><span style=3D"color:rgb(46,71,93);font-family:&quot;Lexend Deca&quo=
t;,sans-serif"><br></span></div><div><span style=3D"color:rgb(46,71,93);fon=
t-family:&quot;Lexend Deca&quot;,sans-serif">Brad</span></div></div>

--000000000000be9b6205f4b0e8e6--