Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1rSNOB-00DNH7-IM for pgsql-odbc@arkaria.postgresql.org; Tue, 23 Jan 2024 20:28:56 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=malur.postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1rSNOA-00GPuM-Ek for pgsql-odbc@arkaria.postgresql.org; Tue, 23 Jan 2024 20:28:54 +0000 Received: from makus.postgresql.org ([2001:4800:3e1:1::229]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1rS4Of-007oCU-Io for pgsql-odbc@lists.postgresql.org; Tue, 23 Jan 2024 00:12:09 +0000 Received: from mail-ed1-x533.google.com ([2a00:1450:4864:20::533]) by makus.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1rS4OZ-002sDZ-NV for pgsql-odbc@postgresql.org; Tue, 23 Jan 2024 00:12:08 +0000 Received: by mail-ed1-x533.google.com with SMTP id 4fb4d7f45d1cf-55c33773c0aso1514150a12.1 for ; Mon, 22 Jan 2024 16:12:03 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1705968721; x=1706573521; darn=postgresql.org; h=to:subject:message-id:date:from:mime-version:from:to:cc:subject :date:message-id:reply-to; bh=HCwrFg4UeR09JaLizv4BQ6fLKYybNGsDFofbg/wal/I=; b=R7NhX9PPkhenmDgztWf5sw06HCRNOffAgpdcxJ7kp9yulvTZSOBb59SdZjAaUXTJKA 4dDoua2yCfPvsOLByNGmJ4PWEqtVUaxazhW4cWDWoXmTAJICYpITYGsqMJpNhhWba1M0 R1/rl6qYuAdWvtE8YsmoE8Qah7FfAFG8WdMe3hQviCl9FIHsWiDPl/6BCu6Bb9+rVTCa JkdsEsvjlHSOEcKypg/6mVcXU5rhSCaZ1ObbE5DNfAWn6/Q8NxpfwWnb2gMq8WoW8E56 ZC5K+AF62lMy68BL56/8YkRhFFMcdSqpuHmL27WV7L/RJWmdAx/b/4KcD8zogRt/Wc69 X7MQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1705968721; x=1706573521; h=to:subject:message-id:date:from:mime-version:x-gm-message-state :from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=HCwrFg4UeR09JaLizv4BQ6fLKYybNGsDFofbg/wal/I=; b=uYwS7Sm8+1JYcAcDACUpEpcwcc4dW1MeXdS/PEj3gGtgwWwJoUxhvzkq/JJBH/fAut VbBhlyLXsXSJy1drDZaLZjuLtuIKTvdy3iUNa2VrGkMa41IdmVY8zTKctptMlhx6aw7T zYOkudSytV1mZYVlTnhNoWvgfUfapg9CNxurN4Mg7eehTZ8MhcPs9cfkSf9FHHDWsXnW FsI2ylruN04UOAu4RhsmthipIl6r1syHwoGqmdJzu3fT0AqkFP9g8zmGbyNgdG6aRa6+ lMdKSfKpR+0MjSPurAIaXNuzJk6CE5V69NCsR91Hc2QKR1G5PHJyP7/4W7vLBfIJsup0 NVYg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YzPPUgO49qrpOEaeAhfnZxAr90bvUiHbz9O6DG4VyS9paYYEwj7 eCzvF152dfkXEIgVzOrELYNzVw34ad0okDCs7etMOBPi+D8p5iboAICp6tET3vBxvt3FMLxEkVE zbuzDCa6VN6eD2/7ghRmDUmC9+m3s6bxmL0I= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IESdOjP0hZMYjdn6I864hu2MFGHnqYa0y5bIxoEO9mc+AinpT+aeAm6k7yFw4FlSpAwFNzHISSjst7Aqj+W7KQ= X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:6895:b0:a30:85a0:c91a with SMTP id n21-20020a170906689500b00a3085a0c91amr736387ejr.62.1705968720998; Mon, 22 Jan 2024 16:12:00 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 From: Juan Ignacio Fernigrini Date: Mon, 22 Jan 2024 21:11:49 -0300 Message-ID: Subject: ssh tunneling To: pgsql-odbc@postgresql.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000009cf6e0060f91cbe5" List-Id: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Owner: List-Archive: Archived-At: Precedence: bulk --0000000000009cf6e0060f91cbe5 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Good morning team, I hope this message finds you well. I am tasked with establishing a connection to my database using ODBC with SSH tunneling. Unfortunately, the current ODBC solution is not compatible. I have explored alternatives such as Devart, but it comes at a cost of $250. I am considering whether it would be more beneficial to invest this amount in developing the required feature within the existing open-source ODBC solution. Best regards, Juan Ignacio Fernigrini --0000000000009cf6e0060f91cbe5 Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Good morning team,

I hope this message= finds you well.

I am tasked with establishing a c= onnection to my database using ODBC with SSH tunneling. Unfortunately, the = current ODBC solution is not compatible. I have explored alternatives such = as Devart, but it comes at a cost of $250. I am considering whether it woul= d be more beneficial to invest this amount in developing the required featu= re within the existing open-source ODBC solution.

= Best regards,
Juan Ignacio Fernigrini

--0000000000009cf6e0060f91cbe5--