public inbox for [email protected]
help / color / mirror / Atom feedFrom: Dave Cramer <[email protected]>
To: Blade Freed <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Re: Question - ODBC driver version vs. PostgreSQL version
Date: Mon, 23 Oct 2023 07:19:11 -0400
Message-ID: <CADK3HH+EQN0HFdPf8_yA6p6GWYKOv3uSTV_hWcUvzBtviSQjeA@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAH49OtW416fJmF7ikg0JTA13gJeLw=iJT+Y9pTCx7ckNjTUNFA@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAH49OtW416fJmF7ikg0JTA13gJeLw=iJT+Y9pTCx7ckNjTUNFA@mail.gmail.com>
I've just started taking over the ODBC project so take this with a grain of
salt. My experience is that new drivers work on older versions. How far
back that goes I cannot guarantee.
Dave Cramer
www.postgres.rocks
On Sun, 22 Oct 2023 at 10:58, Blade Freed <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I was wondering if the psqlodbc drivers are backwards compatible? If so,
> are there any reasons why I should not always choose the most current odbc
> version?
>
> If they are not backwards compatible should I just use a driver with the
> same major version number?
>
> - For example, currently PostgreSQL v13.12
> <https://www.enterprisedb.com/downloads/postgres-postgresql-downloads;
> is available but the most current major ODBC is v13.02
> <https://www.postgresql.org/ftp/odbc/versions/msi/;
>
> Thank you for your time,
> Blade
>
view thread (2+ messages)
reply
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: [email protected]
Cc: [email protected], [email protected]
Subject: Re: Question - ODBC driver version vs. PostgreSQL version
In-Reply-To: <CADK3HH+EQN0HFdPf8_yA6p6GWYKOv3uSTV_hWcUvzBtviSQjeA@mail.gmail.com>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by agora; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox