Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1r7wfq-007aQw-L3 for pgsql-odbc@arkaria.postgresql.org; Tue, 28 Nov 2023 11:54:42 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=malur.postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1r7wfp-004dY4-BA for pgsql-odbc@arkaria.postgresql.org; Tue, 28 Nov 2023 11:54:41 +0000 Received: from magus.postgresql.org ([2a02:c0:301:0:ffff::29]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1r7wfp-004dXs-3g for pgsql-odbc@lists.postgresql.org; Tue, 28 Nov 2023 11:54:41 +0000 Received: from pgintl.fastcrypt.com ([149.56.129.164]) by magus.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1r7wfj-008xj0-V6 for pgsql-odbc@postgresql.org; Tue, 28 Nov 2023 11:54:40 +0000 Received: from mail-lf1-f52.google.com (mail-lf1-f52.google.com [209.85.167.52]) by pgintl.fastcrypt.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 8F19B202C1 for ; Tue, 28 Nov 2023 06:54:33 -0500 (EST) Received: by mail-lf1-f52.google.com with SMTP id 2adb3069b0e04-50bb83d9e17so997870e87.0 for ; Tue, 28 Nov 2023 03:54:33 -0800 (PST) X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YwJDVFUwS+YXygKpmrudhJYst2nbH/r7eTmE3XYybn5933VlFN7 cmsnRJV+70DaVkfEfrG3Joycaz2QcEy04YVbe5U= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IFx8GffGWyMy45xPq2d4hDO8i4Eb6f25OTjyukVgM4QZ+siXqDsxfgmpSqECbeIidSc6xqQfg8ztBGql2/7fgw= X-Received: by 2002:a05:6512:3e0f:b0:50b:c014:3b69 with SMTP id i15-20020a0565123e0f00b0050bc0143b69mr616232lfv.34.1701172472130; Tue, 28 Nov 2023 03:54:32 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: In-Reply-To: From: Dave Cramer Date: Tue, 28 Nov 2023 06:54:14 -0500 X-Gmail-Original-Message-ID: Message-ID: Subject: Re: Issue with the existing psqlodbc version of upgraded instance To: Chirag Karkera Cc: pgsql-odbc@postgresql.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000e730c5060b3514e9" List-Id: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Owner: List-Archive: Archived-At: Precedence: bulk --000000000000e730c5060b3514e9 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Hi Chirag, On Tue, 28 Nov 2023 at 03:19, Chirag Karkera wrote: > Hi Team, > > We have upgraded the RDS database version from v13.10 to v15.4 > > The current odbc version we are using is below, > Name : postgresql-odbc > Version : 09.03.0100 > Release : 2.el7 > Architecture: x86_64 > > Do we have any specific matrix where we can check the compatibility issue. > 09.03.0100 is almost 10 years old PostgreSQL: File Browser While we don't have a compatibility matrix generally speaking you should be using the latest version of the driver. My recommendation is that you upgrade to at least 15.0 if not 16.0 Regards, Dave Cramer > --000000000000e730c5060b3514e9 Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Hi Chir= ag,




On= Tue, 28 Nov 2023 at 03:19, Chirag Karkera <chiragkrkr102@gmail.com> wrote:
Hi = Team,=C2=A0

We have upgraded the RDS database version fr= om v13.10 to v15.4=C2=A0

The current odbc version = we are using is below,=C2=A0
Name=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0= : postgresql-odbc
Version=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0: 09.03.0100
<= div>Release=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0: 2.el7
Architecture: x86_64
=

Do we have any specific=C2=A0matrix where we can = check the compatibility issue.=C2=A0
09.03.0100 is almost 10 years old=C2=A0PostgreSQL: File Browser

While we don't have a compatibility matrix generally s= peaking you should be using the latest version of the driver. My recommenda= tion is that you upgrade to at least 15.0 if not 16.0

<= div>Regards,
Dave Cramer
--000000000000e730c5060b3514e9--