Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1trc27-006E9Z-Id for pgsql-odbc@arkaria.postgresql.org; Mon, 10 Mar 2025 12:14:59 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=malur.postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1trc26-00AWlq-9O for pgsql-odbc@arkaria.postgresql.org; Mon, 10 Mar 2025 12:14:58 +0000 Received: from makus.postgresql.org ([2001:4800:3e1:1::229]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1trc26-00AWli-22 for pgsql-odbc@lists.postgresql.org; Mon, 10 Mar 2025 12:14:58 +0000 Received: from pgintl.fastcrypt.com ([149.56.129.164]) by makus.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from ) id 1trc23-0021bZ-35 for pgsql-odbc@postgresql.org; Mon, 10 Mar 2025 12:14:57 +0000 Received: from mail-ej1-f49.google.com (mail-ej1-f49.google.com [209.85.218.49]) by pgintl.fastcrypt.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id D349520240 for ; Mon, 10 Mar 2025 08:14:54 -0400 (EDT) Received: by mail-ej1-f49.google.com with SMTP id a640c23a62f3a-aaee2c5ee6eso572478366b.1 for ; Mon, 10 Mar 2025 05:14:54 -0700 (PDT) X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YxRYQHxeT7zi/2ijFg8qlPnvrE82a0lBk/Oead4poqT5sXkGPg4 zIA4guxn6Aw8XBPxdeNfaxSOYXIwu2p5e3lrORO5vD5UJr3WZK2xklR3GH+O/PrMEk0w4K5hg8Z E0gPeC52BcFRn2dZOBDZLWcd26UI= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IE0Y93Ue8Yj9aYIPjhwmIQl+AkrKzm5EWk9RbHp2Q5Ey1fwEI6yv9wSh6JpVLRbTiMphz7NAzLvYLCyQ3KsOG0= X-Received: by 2002:a17:907:9956:b0:ac2:758f:9814 with SMTP id a640c23a62f3a-ac2758fab64mr788216966b.23.1741608893637; Mon, 10 Mar 2025 05:14:53 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: In-Reply-To: From: Dave Cramer Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2025 08:14:36 -0400 X-Gmail-Original-Message-ID: X-Gm-Features: AQ5f1Jq5StjqqzAR01UduxSQregmfj5UvJZNIpQ5tk-TxXpr5KwcJBujlM1ThFE Message-ID: Subject: Re: Diferences between mimalloc and regular releases? To: Joan Cc: pgsql-odbc@postgresql.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000007175c8062ffbebd7" List-Id: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Owner: List-Archive: Archived-At: Precedence: bulk --0000000000007175c8062ffbebd7 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Please ask the question on github. You will likely get a better answer there as the author of mimalloc will see it Dave Cramer www.postgres.rocks On Tue, 4 Mar 2025 at 11:41, Joan wrote: > I am looking into the best version of the ODBC to install in a current > system (windows server 2019 to a posgres 17 server). I've seen on the > relelases site here (https://www.postgresql.org/ftp/odbc/releases/), that > there are two different versions of the odbc: > - standard one > - mimalloc for better memory management > > It seems to came from here > https://github.com/postgresql-interfaces/psqlodbc/pull/14 > Are there any inconvenients with the mimalloc version or should be the > preferred in case of doubt? > --0000000000007175c8062ffbebd7 Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Please ask the question on github. You will likely ge= t a better answer there as the author of mimalloc will see it
=
Dave Cramer
www.postgres.rocks
=

On Tue, 4 Mar 2025 at 11:41, Joan <aseques@gmail.com> wrote:
I am looki= ng into the best version of the ODBC to install in a current system (window= s server 2019 to a posgres 17 server). I've seen on the relelases site = here (https://www.postgresql.org/ftp/odbc/releases/), that there are t= wo different versions of the odbc:
- standard one
- mim= alloc for better memory management

Are there any inconvenients with the mimalloc version= or should be the preferred in case of doubt?
--0000000000007175c8062ffbebd7--