Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1quZuf-000o3s-9N for pgsql-odbc@arkaria.postgresql.org; Sun, 22 Oct 2023 14:58:45 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=malur.postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1quZuc-00GxAC-SA for pgsql-odbc@arkaria.postgresql.org; Sun, 22 Oct 2023 14:58:43 +0000 Received: from makus.postgresql.org ([2001:4800:3e1:1::229]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1qtwAC-007BCa-Rl for pgsql-odbc@lists.postgresql.org; Fri, 20 Oct 2023 20:32:09 +0000 Received: from mail-wm1-x332.google.com ([2a00:1450:4864:20::332]) by makus.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1qtwAA-001Tra-RJ for pgsql-odbc@postgresql.org; Fri, 20 Oct 2023 20:32:08 +0000 Received: by mail-wm1-x332.google.com with SMTP id 5b1f17b1804b1-40806e4106dso7616775e9.1 for ; Fri, 20 Oct 2023 13:32:06 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1697833925; x=1698438725; darn=postgresql.org; h=to:subject:message-id:date:from:mime-version:from:to:cc:subject :date:message-id:reply-to; bh=25OMnUFdbp+K/qBxDKxLeypyaBUe5AC0ZgAchblRw00=; b=RMxvMAanHrF7xperFEdvKsD/4lFE6uDVTbrL8ikXBxN6+1kL5kMsyZFc/1h0qt8WCz 10H7gzFXtrgCD3VJT/31oRNfBzqhd0oYbpKk4UoBxSpxMZq1+wXlxYSwtnSPGWQXSiwX ln49cqcE5CbwZQXBO/TAZv1r+8nxWW+XnCWF3IZh22qfanJ6rgE72ycnuoD2/f3avgb3 ZLxNSChh4OJchrKgOlbzkslzUs6vQtlTaC93TLmLiahobQbz026+sq3Uf/Ky2V9Geozq WucGnW2MAaqWlr7gSd0uVAtaDsFw0mxroHSKDYkHxAi0TX7Af34vRDnW1cc5MOiknFeS EGRQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1697833925; x=1698438725; h=to:subject:message-id:date:from:mime-version:x-gm-message-state :from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=25OMnUFdbp+K/qBxDKxLeypyaBUe5AC0ZgAchblRw00=; b=JOUORihUrUONDPIxuF0Vf1951XSOPwDodESrfy/5n8H/MW142mGoANQEdI5fCOHNuW 31pH1SUMPUYeabFm/sCceuV+c14pINS6cFtMdT+NyDigcnSZtQ7GDGitzWx4S/AXHxDC wjX5TCwKs5mAaImbqK+58iNMG/7HJmqgeKGwi/8FDZF2uM4n02jWLmZML0bySdMrDwpu 1A0j2pPx5lZjmTc+VvORGFH+3TKLIatiHEBUR8UnhjitpPA6ZkH28XiDmsWxAbCgRvWD sAx1pbiR15cNm9eN1NWrCPCePpg6RSGJlOD+c95ZwU6Dnju6RUOrPG2nuc0RQDBDlUEP uKag== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0Yx7G+xURgd4FNuVz3oXdNNSlsMTaR2lpawGo2OPSbVxOX+j9ThO E3DwkWkZglC4U4Yz6vuIrCeTtR7Yw/eVYwvDjXSHEpsN X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IHrzOEufgGYiGhgDwd2BVPB55Q8PnW7mT0qa/KlF0r0nwaxqQqMOJMM4N4YJXux4pwZAbD+6zK1X1Smz13+ijc= X-Received: by 2002:a05:600c:3789:b0:3fe:d67d:5040 with SMTP id o9-20020a05600c378900b003fed67d5040mr6355545wmr.5.1697833924838; Fri, 20 Oct 2023 13:32:04 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 From: Blade Freed Date: Fri, 20 Oct 2023 15:31:53 -0500 Message-ID: Subject: Question - ODBC driver version vs. PostgreSQL version To: pgsql-odbc@postgresql.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000fa4b4a06082bc3ad" List-Id: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Owner: List-Archive: Archived-At: Precedence: bulk --000000000000fa4b4a06082bc3ad Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Hello, I was wondering if the psqlodbc drivers are backwards compatible? If so, are there any reasons why I should not always choose the most current odbc version? If they are not backwards compatible should I just use a driver with the same major version number? - For example, currently PostgreSQL v13.12 is available but the most current major ODBC is v13.02 Thank you for your time, Blade --000000000000fa4b4a06082bc3ad Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Hello,

I was wondering if the psqlodbc = drivers are backwards compatible? If so, are there any reasons why I should= =C2=A0not always choose the most current odbc version?

=
If they are not backwards compatible should I just use a driver with t= he same major version number?
Blade
--000000000000fa4b4a06082bc3ad--